Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28154949›Full record

ArticleBehavior genetics2017

Differential Gene Expression Associated with Honey Bee Grooming Behavior in Response to Varroa Mites.

Mollah Md Hamiduzzaman, Berna Emsen, Greg J Hunt, Subhashree Subramanyam, Christie E Williams, Jennifer M Tsuruda, Ernesto Guzman-Novoa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior genetics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Real-Time Recognition and Detection ofSensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. A Spotlight on the Egyptian Honeybee (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mollah Md HamiduzzamanSchool of Environmental Sciences, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road East, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada.
Berna EmsenDepartment of Animal Science, Ataturk University, 25240, Erzurum, Turkey.
Greg J HuntDepartment of Entomology, Purdue University, 901 West State Street, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA.
Subhashree SubramanyamDepartment of Agronomy, Purdue University, 915 West State Street, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA.
Christie E WilliamsDepartment of Agronomy, Purdue University, 915 West State Street, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA.
Jennifer M TsurudaClemson University, 130 McGinty Ct, Clemson, SC, 29634, USA.
Ernesto Guzman-NovoaSchool of Environmental Sciences, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road East, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada. eguzman@uoguelph.ca.ORCID 0000-0001-5632-0642

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Honey bee (Apis mellifera) grooming behavior is an important mechanism of resistance against the parasitic mite Varroa destructor. This research was conducted to study associations between grooming behavior and the expression of selected immune, neural, detoxification, developmental and health-related genes. Individual bees tested in a laboratory assay for various levels of grooming behavior in response to V. destructor were also analyzed for gene expression. Intense groomers (IG) were most efficient in that they needed significantly less time to start grooming and fewer grooming attempts to successfully remove mites from their bodies than did light groomers (LG). In addition, the relative abundance of the neurexin-1 mRNA, was significantly higher in IG than in LG, no groomers (NG) or control (bees without mite). The abundance of poly U binding factor kd 68 and cytochrome p450 mRNAs were significantly higher in IG than in control bees. The abundance of hymenoptaecin mRNA was significantly higher in IG than in NG, but it was not different from that of control bees. The abundance of vitellogenin mRNA was not changed by grooming activity. However, the abundance of blue cheese mRNA was significantly reduced in IG compared to LG or NG, but not to control bees. Efficient removal of mites by IG correlated with different gene expression patterns in bees. These results suggest that the level of grooming behavior may be related to the expression pattern of vital honey bee genes. Neurexin-1, in particular, might be useful as a bio-marker for behavioral traits in bees.

Indexed as

AnimalsBeesGene ExpressionGene Expression ProfilingGroomingTranscriptomeVarroidaeApis melliferaGene expressionGrooming behaviorNeurexin, mRNA abundanceVarroa destructor

Identifiers

PMID28154949
PMCPMC5403867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.