Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28154922›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2017

Experimental measurement of breath exit velocity and expirated bloodstain patterns produced under different exhalation mechanisms.

P H Geoghegan, A M Laffra, N K Hoogendorp, M C Taylor, M C Jermy

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Airborne pathogen projection during ophthalmic examination.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

P H GeogheganDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Canterbury, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch, Canterbury, 8041, New Zealand. patrick.geoghegan@canterbury.ac.nz.
A M LaffraUniversity of Applied Sciences Van Hall Larenstein, Leeuwarden, 8934 CJ, The Netherlands.
N K HoogendorpUniversity of Applied Sciences Van Hall Larenstein, Leeuwarden, 8934 CJ, The Netherlands.
M C TaylorChristchurch Science Centre, Institute of Environmental Science and Research (ESR), 27 Creyke Road, Christchurch, Canterbury, 8041, New Zealand.
M C JermyDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Canterbury, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch, Canterbury, 8041, New Zealand.
University of Canterbury · NZVan Hall Larenstein University of Applied Sciences · NLNew Zealand Institute for Public Health and Forensic Science · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In an attempt to obtain a deeper understanding of the factors which determine the characteristics of expirated bloodstain patterns, the mechanism of formation of airborne droplets was studied. Hot wire anemometry measured air velocity, 25 mm from the lips, for 31 individuals spitting, coughing and blowing. Expirated stains were produced by the same mechanisms performed by one individual with different volumes of a synthetic blood substitute in their mouth. The atomization of the liquid at the lips was captured with high-speed video, and the resulting stain patterns were captured on paper targets. Peak air velocities varied for blowing (6 to 64 m/s), spitting (1 to 64 m/s) and coughing (1 to 47 m/s), with mean values of 12 m/s (blowing), 7 m/s (spitting) and 4 m/s (coughing). There was a large (55-65%) variation between individuals in air velocity produced, as well as variation between trials for a single individual (25-35%). Spitting and blowing involved similar lip shapes. Blowing had a longer duration of airflow, though it is not the duration but the peak velocity at the beginning of the air motion which appears to control the atomization of blood in the mouth and thus stain formation. Spitting could project quantities of drops at least 1600 mm. Coughing had a shorter range of near 500 mm, with a few droplets travelling further. All mechanisms could spread drops over an angle >45°. Spitting was the most effective for projecting drops of blood from the mouth, due to its combination of chest motion and mouth shape producing strong air velocities. No unique method was found of inferring the physical action (spitting, coughing or blowing) from characteristics of the pattern, except possibly distance travelled. Diameter range in expirated bloodstains varied from very small (<1 mm) in a dense formation to several millimetres. No unique method was found of discriminating expirated patterns from gunshot or impact patterns on stain shape alone. Only 20% of the expirated patterns produced in this study contained identifiable bubble rings or beaded stains.

Indexed as

Blood StainsExhalationAir MovementsCoughForensic MedicineHumansModels, BiologicalRheologyBloodstain pattern analysisExpirated bloodForensic investigationHigh-speed imagingHot wire anemometry

Identifiers

PMID28154922
OpenAlexW2584417302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.