Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28154836›Full record

ArticleEGEMS (Washington, DC)2016

Monitoring Prevalence, Treatment, and Control of Metabolic Conditions in New York City Adults Using 2013 Primary Care Electronic Health Records: A Surveillance Validation Study.

Lorna E Thorpe, Katharine H McVeigh, Sharon Perlman, Pui Ying Chan, Katherine Bartley, Lauren Schreibstein, Jesica Rodriguez-Lopez, Remle Newton-Dame

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EGEMS (Washington, DC), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Post-9/11 veterans' heart disease knowledge, self-perceived risk, and prevention beliefs and behaviors.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. NYC HANES 2013-14 and Reflections on Future Population Health Surveillance.Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine · 2018
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lorna E ThorpeNYU School of Medicine Department of Population Health.
Katharine H McVeighNew York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene.
Sharon PerlmanNew York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene.
Pui Ying ChanNew York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene.
Katherine BartleyNew York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene.
Lauren SchreibsteinFormerly New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene.
Jesica Rodriguez-LopezCUNY School of Public Health.
Remle Newton-DameFormerly New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene.

Funding

New York University, City University of New York Health Promotion & Prevention ReU48DP005008 · DP · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI THORPE, LORNA, TRINH-SHEVRIN, CHAU · 2014 to 2018
$6.9M
PPHF-13 NY CITY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & MENTAL HYGIENE 2011-2012 ENVIRONMENTAL PUBU38EH000939 · EH · NEW YORK CITY HEALTH/MENTAL HYGIENE · PI MCKELVEY, WENDY · 2011 to 2015
$4.8M
NCCDPHP CDC HHS U48 DP005008NCEH CDC HHS U38 EH000939
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionElectronic health records (EHRs) can potentially extend chronic disease surveillance, but few EHR-based initiatives tracking population-based metrics have been validated for accuracy. We designed a new EHR-based population health surveillance system for New York City (NYC) known as NYC Macroscope. This report is the third in a 3-part series describing the development and validation of that system. The first report describes governance and technical infrastructure underlying the NYC Macroscope. The second report describes validation methods and presents validation results for estimates of obesity, smoking, depression and influenza vaccination. In this third paper we present validation findings for metabolic indicators (hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes).

methodsWe compared EHR-based estimates to those from a gold standard surveillance source - the 2013-2014 NYC Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NYC HANES) - overall and stratified by sex and age group, using the two one-sided test of equivalence and other validation criteria.

resultsEHR-based hypertension prevalence estimates were highly concordant with NYC HANES estimates. Diabetes prevalence estimates were highly concordant when measuring diagnosed diabetes but less so when incorporating laboratory results. Hypercholesterolemia prevalence estimates were less concordant overall. Measures to assess treatment and control of the 3 metabolic conditions performed poorly. DISCUSSION: While indicator performance was variable, findings here confirm that a carefully constructed EHR-based surveillance system can generate prevalence estimates comparable to those from gold-standard examination surveys for certain metabolic conditions such as hypertension and diabetes.

conclusionsStandardized EHR metrics have potential utility for surveillance at lower annual costs than surveys, especially as representativeness of contributing clinical practices to EHR-based surveillance systems increases.

Indexed as

cardiovascular risk factorschronic diseasesElectronic health records (EHR)metabolic conditionssurveillancevalidation

Identifiers

PMID28154836
PMCPMC5226388

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.