Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28154458›Full record

Trial reportCanadian journal of veterinary research = Revue canadienne de recherche veterinaire2017

Analysis of efficacy obtained with a trivalent inactivated

Zhanqin Zhao, Huisheng Liu, Yun Xue, Kunpeng Chen, Zhijun Liu, Qiao Xue, Chen Wang

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Canadian journal of veterinary research = Revue canadienne de recherche veterinaire, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Research progress onFrontiers in veterinary science · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Molecular Characterization and Phylogenetic Analysis ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  5. Effect of Vaccination againstVeterinary sciences · 2022
    Article
  6. TbpBPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  7. Identification ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Comparison of theFrontiers in veterinary science · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Zhanqin ZhaoLaboratory of Veterinary Microbiology, College of Animal Science and Technology (Zhao, Liu, Chen, Q. Xue, Wang); Laboratory of Medical Engineering, College of Medical Technology and Engineering, Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang, China (Y. Xue).
Huisheng LiuLaboratory of Veterinary Microbiology, College of Animal Science and Technology (Zhao, Liu, Chen, Q. Xue, Wang); Laboratory of Medical Engineering, College of Medical Technology and Engineering, Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang, China (Y. Xue).
Yun XueLaboratory of Veterinary Microbiology, College of Animal Science and Technology (Zhao, Liu, Chen, Q. Xue, Wang); Laboratory of Medical Engineering, College of Medical Technology and Engineering, Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang, China (Y. Xue).
Kunpeng ChenLaboratory of Veterinary Microbiology, College of Animal Science and Technology (Zhao, Liu, Chen, Q. Xue, Wang); Laboratory of Medical Engineering, College of Medical Technology and Engineering, Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang, China (Y. Xue).
Zhijun LiuLaboratory of Veterinary Microbiology, College of Animal Science and Technology (Zhao, Liu, Chen, Q. Xue, Wang); Laboratory of Medical Engineering, College of Medical Technology and Engineering, Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang, China (Y. Xue).
Qiao XueLaboratory of Veterinary Microbiology, College of Animal Science and Technology (Zhao, Liu, Chen, Q. Xue, Wang); Laboratory of Medical Engineering, College of Medical Technology and Engineering, Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang, China (Y. Xue).
Chen WangLaboratory of Veterinary Microbiology, College of Animal Science and Technology (Zhao, Liu, Chen, Q. Xue, Wang); Laboratory of Medical Engineering, College of Medical Technology and Engineering, Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang, China (Y. Xue).

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy of a trivalent inactivated

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, BacterialBacterial VaccinesFemaleHaemophilus InfectionsHaemophilus parasuisSerogroupSwineSwine DiseasesVaccines, InactivatedAntibodies, BacterialBacterial VaccinesVaccines, Inactivated

Identifiers

PMID28154458
PMCPMC5220590

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.