Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28154137›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2017

Biosynthesis of cabbage phytoalexins from indole glucosinolate.

Andrew P Klein, Elizabeth S Sattely

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 89 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Overlooked and misunderstood: can glutathione conjugates be clues to understanding plant glutathione transferases?Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Review
  8. Review
  9. EngineeringACS synthetic biology · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andrew P KleinDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305.
Elizabeth S SattelyDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305 sattely@stanford.edu.
Stanford University · US

Funding

Liberation of Plant Nutrients by the Gut MicrobiotaDP2AT008321 · NCCIH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI SATTELY, ELIZABETH SUSAN · 2013 to 2013
$2.4M
Discovery and Engineering of Plant Natural Product PathwaysR01GM121527 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI SATTELY, ELIZABETH SUSAN · 2017 to 2025
$2.3M
NCCIH NIH HHS DP2 AT008321NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM121527
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Arabidopsisbeta-GlucosidaseBrassica rapaCarbon-Sulfur LyasesDisease ResistanceGlucosinolatesIndolesMetabolic EngineeringMethylationMethyltransferasesNicotianaPhytoalexinsPlant Physiological PhenomenaPlant ProteinsPlants, Genetically ModifiedSesquiterpenesbeta-GlucosidasebrassininCarbon-Sulfur LyasesGlucosinolatesIndolesMethyltransferasesPhytoalexinsPlant ProteinsSesquiterpenesThiocarbamatesBrassica rapadithiocarbamatemetabolic engineeringplant natural products

Identifiers

PMID28154137
PMCPMC5338394
OpenAlexW2585464311

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.