ArticleCirculation2017
Sex Differences in Faculty Rank Among Academic Cardiologists in the United States.
Article in Circulation, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
66 citing papers in PubMed.
- Research Conducted in Women Was Deemed More Impactful but Less Publishable than the Same Research Conducted in Men.Journal of women's health (2002) · 2021Trial
- Cardiovascular imaging in women: from diagnostic bias to inclusive cardiovascular science.European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice · 2026Article
- Research priorities for adult hospital medicine: A survey of US hospital medicine leaders.Journal of hospital medicine · 2025Article
- Barriers and Facilitators to Women's Careers in Academic Cardiology: A Multicenter Qualitative Analysis.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Article
- A Survey on the Perceptions of Puerto Rican Cardiologists on the Use of Smartwatches and Implantable Loop Recorders.Cureus · 2025Article
- Balancing Panels: Lets Call on Women Speakers.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2025Review
- Changing the rhythm of leadership: The Heart Rhythm Society Growth and Leadership Opportunity for Women in Electrophysiology initiative.HeartRhythm case reports · 2025Article
- Representation of Women Among Cardiology Grand Rounds Speakers in the United States.JAMA cardiology · 2025Article
- Trends of Representation of Women in Professional Medical Societal Leadership in the United States and Europe.JACC. Advances · 2025Article
- Cultivating a thriving environment for women in cardiology through leadership and inclusion.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2025Article
- Review
- Mind the Gap! Working Toward Gender Equity in Pediatric and Congenital Heart Disease: Present and Future.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2024Review
- Hematologic health services and practical characteristics: report of a nationwide survey among Chinese hematologists.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Sex Disparities in Cardiovascular Disease.Methodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal · 2024Review
- Gender disparities in altmetric attention scores for cardiovascular research.Communications biology · 2023Article
- Primum Non Discernere: Glass Ceilings and Female Representation at the European Association of Urology and European Society for Paediatric Urology Annual Meetings, 2012-2022.European urology open science · 2023Article
- Contributions of Women to Cardiovascular Science Over Two Decades: Authorship, Leadership, and Mentorship.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2023Article
- Moving toward gender equity in the cardiology and cardiovascular research workforce in Germany: a report from the German Cardiac Society.European heart journal open · 2023Article
- Article
- Editorial: Women in Cardiac Electrophysiology: 2022.Frontiers in physiology · 2023Article
6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundStudies demonstrate that women physicians are less likely than men to be full professors. Comprehensive evidence examining whether sex differences in faculty rank exist in academic cardiology, adjusting for experience and research productivity, is lacking. Therefore, we evaluated for sex differences in faculty rank among a comprehensive, contemporary cohort of US cardiologists after adjustment for several factors that impact academic advancement, including measures of clinical experience and research productivity.
methodsWe identified all US cardiologists with medical school faculty appointments in 2014 by using the American Association of Medical Colleges faculty roster and linked this list to a comprehensive physician database from Doximity, a professional networking website for doctors. Data on physician age, sex, years since residency, cardiology subspecialty, publications, National Institutes of Health grants, and registered clinical trials were available for all academic cardiologists. We estimated sex differences in full professorship, adjusting for these factors and medical school-specific fixed effects in a multivariable regression model.
resultsAmong 3810 cardiologists with faculty appointments in 2014 (13.3% of all US cardiologists), 630 (16.5%) were women. Women faculty were younger than men (mean age, 48.3 years versus 53.5 years, P<0.001), had fewer total publications (mean number: 16.5 publications versus 25.2 publications; P<0.001), were similarly likely to have National Institutes of Health funding (proportion with at least 1 National Institutes of Health award, 10.8% versus 10.4%; P=0.77), and were less likely to have a registered clinical trial (percentage with at least 1 clinical trial, 8.9% versus 11.1%; P=0.10). Among 3180 men, 973 (30.6%) were full professors in comparison with 100 (15.9%) of 630 women. In adjusted analyses, women were less likely to be full professors than men (adjusted odds ratio, 0.63; 95% confidence interval, 0.43-0.94; P=0.02; adjusted proportions, 22.7% versus 26.7%; absolute difference, -4.0%; 95% confidence interval, -7.5% to -0.7%).
conclusionsAmong cardiology faculty at US medical schools, women were less likely than men to be full professors after accounting for several factors known to influence faculty rank.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.