ReviewThe lancet. Psychiatry2017
How do antidepressants work? New perspectives for refining future treatment approaches.
Review in The lancet. Psychiatry, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 251 papers, 18 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Evaluation of Schemes of Administration of Intravenous Ketamine in Treatment-resistant Depression: Clinical-neuroimaging Correlation
The Effect of Seven-Day Atorvastatin Administration on Emotional Processing, Reward Processing, and Inflammation in Healthy Volunteers
Investigating the Effects of Social Movement on Mood and Social and Emotional Functioning in Young People Experiencing Low Mood
Effects of Single-dose Semaglutide on Cognition and Energy in Healthy Volunteers
Who cites it
251 citing papers in PubMed, 18 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 597 citations in OpenAlex.
- Alterations in resting-state brain activity patterns following antidepressant treatment: insights from a coordinate-based meta-analysis.Psychological medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Antidepressant activity of flavones from traditional Chinese medicine: a meta-analysis.Pharmaceutical biology · 2025Pooled it
- Discontinuing antidepressant medication: a qualitative evidence synthesis and logic model based on health professionals' views.BMC health services research · 2025Pooled it
- Antidepressants for low back pain and spine-related leg pain.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Antidepressants for pain management in adults with chronic pain: a network meta-analysis.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2024Pooled it
- Antidepressant use and the risk of seizure: a meta-analysis of observational studies.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2024Pooled it
- The serotonin theory of depression: a systematic umbrella review of the evidence.Molecular psychiatry · 2023Pooled it
- Beneficial effects of Silexan on co-occurring depressive symptoms in patients with subthreshold anxiety and anxiety disorders: randomized, placebo-controlled trials revisited.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2023Pooled it
- Drug-drug interactions between psychiatric medications and MDMA or psilocybin: a systematic review.Psychopharmacology · 2022Pooled it
- New generation antidepressants for depression in children and adolescents: a network meta-analysis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Approaches for discontinuation versus continuation of long-term antidepressant use for depressive and anxiety disorders in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Prevention of depression in adults with long-term physical conditions.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Efficacy, acceptability, and safety of antidepressants for low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Antidepressant treatment for postnatal depression.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Classic serotonergic psychedelics for mood and depressive symptoms: a meta-analysis of mood disorder patients and healthy participants.Psychopharmacology · 2021Pooled it
- Statins in Depression: An Evidence-Based Overview of Mechanisms and Clinical Studies.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2021Pooled it
- Statins for major depressive disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.PloS one · 2021Pooled it
- Interventions to support the resilience and mental health of frontline health and social care professionals during and after a disease outbreak, epidemic or pandemic: a mixed methods systematic review.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- The effects of a salsa dance intervention in young people with mild to moderately severe depressive symptoms.Psychological medicine · 2026Trial
- Do antidepressants change our interpretations of facial emotions?Psychological medicine · 2026Trial
191 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Most currently available antidepressants target monoamine neurotransmitter function. However, a purely neurotransmitter-based explanation for antidepressant drug action is challenged by the delayed clinical onset of most agents and the need to explain how neurochemical changes reverse the many different symptoms of depression. Novel approaches to understanding of antidepressant drug action include a focus on early changes in emotional and social processing and the role of neural plasticity. In this Review, we discuss the ways in which these two different theories reflect different or complementary approaches, and how they might be integrated to offer novel solutions for people with depression. We consider the predictions made by these mechanistic approaches for the stratification and development of new therapeutics for depression, and the next steps that need to be made to facilitate this translation of science to the clinic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.