Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28153093›Full record

ArticleMolecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy2017

Human Amniocytes Are Receptive to Chemically Induced Reprogramming to Pluripotency.

Kate E Hawkins, Dafni Moschidou, Danilo Faccenda, Wasco Wruck, Alex Martin-Trujillo, Kwan-Leong Hau, Anna Maria Ranzoni, Veronica Sanchez-Freire, Fabio Tommasini, Simon Eaton and 6 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pluripotent stem cells: induction and self-renewal.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Amniotic Fluid Stem Cells: What They Are and What They Can Become.Current stem cell research & therapy · 2023
    Article
  5. Regenerative medicine: prenatal approaches.The Lancet. Child & adolescent health · 2022
    Review
  6. Vitamin C- and Valproic Acid-Induced Fetal RPE Stem-like Cells Recover Retinal Degeneration via Regulating SOX2.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Kate E HawkinsInstitute for Women's Health, Maternal and Fetal Medicine Department, University College London (UCL), London WC1E 6HX, UK.
Dafni MoschidouInstitute for Women's Health, Maternal and Fetal Medicine Department, University College London (UCL), London WC1E 6HX, UK.
Danilo FaccendaDepartment of Comparative Biomedical Sciences, The Royal Veterinary College (RVC), Royal College Street, London NW1 0TU, UK.
Wasco WruckInstitute for Stem Cell Research and Regenerative Medicine, Heinrich Heine University Dusseldorf, Dusseldorf 40225, Germany.
Alex Martin-TrujilloImprinting and Cancer Group, Cancer Epigenetic and Biology Program, Bellvitge Institute for Biomedical Research (IDIBELL), Hospital Duran i Reynals, Barcelona 08908, Spain.
Kwan-Leong HauInstitute for Women's Health, Maternal and Fetal Medicine Department, University College London (UCL), London WC1E 6HX, UK; Imperial College London, National Heart and Lung Institute, Hammersmith Campus, Du Cane Road, London W12 0NN, UK.
Anna Maria RanzoniInstitute for Women's Health, Maternal and Fetal Medicine Department, University College London (UCL), London WC1E 6HX, UK.
Veronica Sanchez-FreireDepartments of Medicine and Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-5454, USA.
Fabio TommasiniInstitute for Women's Health, Maternal and Fetal Medicine Department, University College London (UCL), London WC1E 6HX, UK; Institute for Child Health, University College London, London WC1N 1EH, UK.
Simon EatonInstitute for Child Health, University College London, London WC1N 1EH, UK.
Paolo De CoppiInstitute for Child Health, University College London, London WC1N 1EH, UK.
David MonkInstitute for Stem Cell Research and Regenerative Medicine, Heinrich Heine University Dusseldorf, Dusseldorf 40225, Germany.
Michelangelo CampanellaDepartment of Comparative Biomedical Sciences, The Royal Veterinary College (RVC), Royal College Street, London NW1 0TU, UK; Consortium for Mitochondrial Research, University College London, Royal College Street, London NW1 0TU, UK.
Adrian J ThrasherInstitute for Child Health, University College London, London WC1N 1EH, UK.
James AdjayeInstitute for Stem Cell Research and Regenerative Medicine, Heinrich Heine University Dusseldorf, Dusseldorf 40225, Germany.
Pascale V GuillotInstitute for Women's Health, Maternal and Fetal Medicine Department, University College London (UCL), London WC1E 6HX, UK. Electronic address: p.guillot@ucl.ac.uk.
University College London · GBHeinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DEInstitut d'Investigació Biomédica de Bellvitge · ESRoyal Veterinary College · GBStanford University · US

Funding

Department of Health RP_2014-04-046
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Restoring pluripotency using chemical compounds alone would be a major step forward in developing clinical-grade pluripotent stem cells, but this has not yet been reported in human cells. We previously demonstrated that VPA_AFS cells, human amniocytes cultivated with valproic acid (VPA) acquired functional pluripotency while remaining distinct from human embryonic stem cells (hESCs), questioning the relationship between the modulation of cell fate and molecular regulation of the pluripotency network. Here, we used single-cell analysis and functional assays to reveal that VPA treatment resulted in a homogeneous population of self-renewing non-transformed cells that fulfill the hallmarks of pluripotency, i.e., a short G1 phase, a dependence on glycolytic metabolism, expression of epigenetic modifications on histones 3 and 4, and reactivation of endogenous OCT4 and downstream targets at a lower level than that observed in hESCs. Mechanistic insights into the process of VPA-induced reprogramming revealed that it was dependent on OCT4 promoter activation, which was achieved independently of the PI3K (phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase)/AKT/mTOR (mammalian target of rapamycin) pathway or GSK3β inhibition but was concomitant with the presence of acetylated histones H3K9 and H3K56, which promote pluripotency. Our data identify, for the first time, the pluripotent transcriptional and molecular signature and metabolic status of human chemically induced pluripotent stem cells.

Indexed as

AmnionBiomarkersCell CycleCell TransdifferentiationCellular ReprogrammingEmbryonic Stem CellsEnergy MetabolismEpigenesis, GeneticFemaleGene ExpressionGene Expression ProfilingGenes, ReporterGlycolysisHistonesHumansInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsBiomarkersHistonesNanog Homeobox ProteinOctamer Transcription Factor-3Phosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesProto-Oncogene Proteins c-aktRecombinant Fusion ProteinsTOR Serine-Threonine Kinasesamniotic stem cellsbiotechnologycell biologychemical reprogrammingdevelopmental biologymedical researchOCT4plasticitypluripotencystem cells

Identifiers

PMID28153093
PMCPMC5368475
OpenAlexW2584020698

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.