Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28152449›Full record

ArticleDrug and alcohol dependence2017

Curbing the DUI offender's self-efficacy to drink and drive: A laboratory study.

Walter Roberts, Mark T Fillmore

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug and alcohol dependence, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Cigarette Smoking as a Predictor of Male DUI Recidivism.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Walter RobertsYale School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, 2 Church Street South, Suite 109, New Haven, CT, 06519, United States.
Mark T FillmoreUniversity of Kentucky, Department of Psychology, 115 Kastle Hall, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, 40506, United States. Electronic address: fillmore@uky.edu.

Funding

Alcohol Tolerance and Behavioral Disinhibition in HumansR01AA018274 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI FILLMORE, MARK T · 2009 to 2013
$1.5M
Behavioral Dysregulation and Alcohol Sensitivity in Risky DriversR01AA021722 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI FILLMORE, MARK T · 2013 to 2016
$1.3M
Effects of alcohol and the environment on driving ability in high-risk driversF31AA022263 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI ROBERTS, WALTER MCRAINEY · 2013 to 2015
$81k
NIAAA NIH HHS F31 AA022263NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA018274NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA021722
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeople arrested for driving under the influence of alcohol (DUI) are at high risk to reoffend. One reason for this high rate of recidivism among DUI offenders is that these individuals systematically underestimate the degree to which alcohol impairs their ability to drive. This study compared perceived and objective driving ability following alcohol and performance feedback in drivers with and without a history of DUI.

methodAdult drivers with (n=20) and without (n=20) a history of DUI arrest attended two dose challenge sessions where they received 0.64g/kg alcohol or placebo, completed a simulated driving task, and provided measures of subjective impairment. They attended a third retesting session where they received feedback that they were impaired by alcohol. They received 0.64g/kg alcohol and their objective and perceived driving ability was retested.

resultsBoth groups showed significant impairment of driving performance following 0.64g/kg alcohol compared to placebo. DUI offenders rated themselves as less impaired than controls. After performance feedback, self-reported impairment during the alcohol retest increased for DUI offenders but not for controls. There was no effect of performance feedback on objective driving ability.

conclusionsThese results support the notion that under alcohol DUI offenders characteristically perceive themselves as better able to drive than non-offenders. These perceptions can be tempered by performance feedback. To the extent that perceived ability to drive safely after drinking contributes to DUI and its recidivism, feedback geared towards lowering this self-efficacy could reduce willingness to engage in this behavior.

Indexed as

Automobile DrivingCriminalsSelf EfficacyAdultAlcohol DrinkingAlcoholic IntoxicationCentral Nervous System DepressantsComputer SimulationDose-Response Relationship, DrugEthanolFeedback, PsychologicalFemaleHumansImpulsive BehaviorMaleNeuropsychological TestsCentral Nervous System DepressantsEthanolAlcoholDrivingDUISelf-efficacySubjective impairment

Identifiers

PMID28152449
PMCPMC5309158

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.