ArticleCancer cytopathology2017
Qualifiers of atypia in the cytologic diagnosis of thyroid nodules are associated with different Afirma gene expression classifier results and clinical outcomes.
Article in Cancer cytopathology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 75 citations in OpenAlex.
- Assessing Bias and Limitations of Clinical Validation Studies of Molecular Diagnostic Tests for Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Thyroid : official journal of the American Thyroid Association · 2022Pooled it
- Thyroseq v3, Afirma GSC, and microRNA Panels Versus Previous Molecular Tests in the Preoperative Diagnosis of Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2021Pooled it
- The Diagnostic Performance of Afirma Gene Expression Classifier for the Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules: A Meta-Analysis.BioMed research international · 2019Pooled it
- Genetic testing for indeterminate thyroid cytology: review and meta-analysis.Endocrine-related cancer · 2018Pooled it
- Performance of Two-Tiered Subclassification of Atypia of Undetermined Significance in Thyroid Fine-Needle Aspiration Without Routine Molecular Testing.Diagnostic cytopathology · 2026Article
- Malignancy Risk, Molecular Mutations, and Surgical Outcomes of Thyroid Nodules Classified as Atypia of Undetermined Significance in the Bethesda System: A Comprehensive Analysis.Cytopathology : official journal of the British Society for Clinical Cytology · 2026Article
- Diagnostic accuracy of Afirma gene expression classifier, Afirma gene sequencing classifier, ThyroSeq v2 and ThyroSeq v3 for indeterminate (Bethesda III and IV) thyroid nodules: a meta-analysis.Endocrine connections · 2024Article
- Performance of Afirma genomic sequencing classifier and histopathological outcome are associated with patterns of atypia in Bethesda category III thyroid nodules.Cancer cytopathology · 2022Article
- Repeat Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology Refines the Selection of Thyroid Nodules for Afirma Gene Expression Classifier Testing.Thyroid : official journal of the American Thyroid Association · 2021Article
- Atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesions of undetermined significance: What radiologists need to know.The neuroradiology journal · 2021Review
- Molecular markers for the classification of cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules.Journal of endocrinological investigation · 2020Review
- Semiquantitative assessment of cytomorphologic features can predict mutation status of thyroid nodules with indeterminate cytologic diagnosis.Human pathology · 2019Article
- Review
- Molecular Testing Versus Diagnostic Lobectomy in Bethesda III/IV Thyroid Nodules: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.Thyroid : official journal of the American Thyroid Association · 2019Article
- Clinical impact of testing for mutations and microRNAs in thyroid nodules.Diagnostic cytopathology · 2019Article
- Extending expressed RNA genomics from surgical decision making for cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules to targeting therapies for metastatic thyroid cancer.Cancer cytopathology · 2019Article
- Impact of oncogene panel results on surgical management of cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules.Head & neck · 2018Article
- Current methodologies for molecular screening of thyroid nodules.Gland surgery · 2018Review
- Thyroid Nodules with Indeterminate Cytology: Utility of the American Thyroid Association Sonographic Patterns for Cancer Risk Stratification.Thyroid : official journal of the American Thyroid Association · 2018Article
- Malignancy Rates of Atypia of Undetermined Significance/Follicular Lesion of Undetermined Significance (AUS/FLUS) Cases: A Tertiary Center Study.Acta endocrinologica (Bucharest, Romania : 2005)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThyroid nodules with atypia of undetermined significance (AUS) on fine-needle aspiration (FNA) have a low risk of malignancy that appears to vary based on specific features described in the AUS diagnosis. The Afirma gene expression classifier (GEC) is a molecular test designed to improve preoperative risk stratification of thyroid nodules, but its performance for different patterns of AUS has not been defined. The objective of this study was to assess GEC results and clinical outcomes in AUS nodules with architectural atypia (AUS-A), cytologic atypia (AUS-C) or both (AUS-C/A).
methodsThis was a retrospective review of all thyroid nodules with AUS cytopathology that underwent GEC testing at the authors' institution over a period of >4 years.
resultsIn 227 nodules that had AUS cytology results and Afirma GEC testing, the rate of benign GEC results was higher in AUS-A nodules (70 of 107; 65%) than in AUS-C/A nodules (25 of 65; 38%; P = .0008), and AUS-C nodules exhibited an intermediate rate of benign results (27 of 55 nodules; 59%). The risk of cancer among patients who had GEC-suspicious nodules, 86% of whom underwent resection, was 19% (6 of 25) for AUS-A nodules compared with 57% (21 of 37) for AUS-C/A nodules (P = .003) and 45% (10 of 22) for AUS-C nodules (P = .07). In nodules that had an indeterminate repeat cytology result, no difference was observed in the rate of benign GEC results or in the malignancy rate compared with nodules that had a single cytology result.
conclusionsThe performance characteristics of Afirma GEC testing vary, depending on qualifiers of cytologic atypia. Recognition of these differences may enable clinicians to provide improved counseling and treatment recommendations to patients. Cancer Cytopathol 2017;125:313-322. © 2017 American Cancer Society.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.