Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28152248›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2017

The complexity of shaping self-management in daily practice.

Hester M van de Bovenkamp, Jolanda Dwarswaard

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04560296 (Community-based E-Health Program for Older Adults Living With Chronic Diseases - A Cluster Controlled Study With Process Evaluation), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04560296 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Community-based E-Health Program for Older Adults Living With Chronic Diseases - A Cluster Controlled Study With Process Evaluation

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational University of SingaporeRan2020 to 2024Enrolled150ConditionsDiabetes Mellitus, Hypertension, HyperlipidemiasArmsCommunity-based E-Health Program, usual self-management and follow up with doctors/nurse
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Exploring Healthcare Paradoxes in Hospital Haemodialysis-A Qualitative Study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Breast Cancer Patients' Perceptions of Adjuvant Radiotherapy: an Assessment of Pre-Treatment Knowledge and Informational Needs.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Self-management and psychological resilience moderate the relationships between symptoms and health-related quality of life among patients with hypertension in China.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2019
    Article
  14. The different perspectives of patients, informal caregivers and professionals on patient involvement in primary care teams. A qualitative study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2018
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The complexity of shaping self-management in daily practice.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2017
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hester M van de BovenkampInstitute of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6412-2707
Jolanda DwarswaardResearch Centre Innovations of Care, Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and contextMany countries are giving patients a more active role in health care, on both the individual and collective level. This study focuses on one aspect of the participation agenda on the individual level: self-management. The study explores self-management in practice, including the implications of the difficulties encountered.

objectiveTo gain insight into the complexity of self-management practice. This is crucial for developing both self-management interventions and the participation policy agenda.

methodsQualitative semi-structured interviews with experts (n=6) and patients with a chronic condition (n=20).

resultsIn terms of level of involvement and type of activity, shaping self-management in practice depends on personal and social dynamics, patients' ideas of the good life and their interactions with care professionals. Clashes can arise when patients and professionals hold differing ideas, based on different values, about the level and type of patient involvement. DISCUSSION: The discussion on self-management should account for the fact that how we define self-management is very much a normative issue. It depends on the norms and values of patients, professionals and underlying health-care policies. Differing ideas present professionals with ethical dilemmas which they should reflect on. However, professional reflection alone is not enough to deal with these dilemmas. The participation agenda needs far wider ranging reflection on how participation relates to other values in health care.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAttitude of Health PersonnelChronic DiseaseFemaleHealthy LifestyleHumansInterpersonal RelationsInterviews as TopicMalePatient ParticipationProfessional-Patient RelationsQualitative ResearchSelf-Managementautonomyethicspatient participationqualitative researchself-management

Identifiers

PMID28152248
PMCPMC5600231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.