Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28151961›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Cortical maturation in children with cochlear implants: Correlation between electrophysiological and behavioral measurement.

Liliane Aparecida Fagundes Silva, Maria Inês Vieira Couto, Fernanda C L Magliaro, Robinson Koji Tsuji, Ricardo Ferreira Bento, Ana Claudia Martinho de Carvalho, Carla Gentile Matas

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Electrophysiological Characteristics in Pediatric Cochlear Implantation.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials in 2-Year-Old Subjects.International archives of otorhinolaryngology · 2020
    Article
  8. Cochlear Implantation Outcome in Children with DFNB1Journal of clinical medicine · 2020
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Liliane Aparecida Fagundes SilvaDepartment of Physical, Speech and Occupational, FMUSP, São Paulo (SP), Brazil.
Maria Inês Vieira CoutoDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Clinical Hospital, FMUSP, São Paulo (SP), Brazil.
Fernanda C L MagliaroDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Clinical Hospital, FMUSP, São Paulo (SP), Brazil.
Robinson Koji TsujiDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Clinical Hospital, FMUSP, São Paulo (SP), Brazil.
Ricardo Ferreira BentoDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Clinical Hospital, FMUSP, São Paulo (SP), Brazil.
Ana Claudia Martinho de CarvalhoDepartment of Physical, Speech and Occupational, FMUSP, São Paulo (SP), Brazil.
Carla Gentile MatasDepartment of Physical, Speech and Occupational, FMUSP, São Paulo (SP), Brazil.
Hospital São Paulo · BRCentro Universitário das Faculdades Metropolitanas Unidas · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Central auditory pathway maturation in children depends on auditory sensory stimulation. The objective of the present study was to monitor the cortical maturation of children with cochlear implants using electrophysiological and auditory skills measurements. The study was longitudinal and consisted of 30 subjects, 15 (8 girls and 7 boys) of whom had a cochlear implant, with a mean age at activation time of 36.4 months (minimum, 17 months; maximum, 66 months), and 15 of whom were normal-hearing children who were matched based on gender and chronological age. The auditory and speech skills of the children with cochlear implants were evaluated using GASP, IT-MAIS and MUSS measures. Both groups underwent electrophysiological evaluation using long-latency auditory evoked potentials. Each child was evaluated at three and nine months after cochlear implant activation, with the same time interval adopted for the hearing children. The results showed improvements in auditory and speech skills as measured by IT-MAIS and MUSS. Similarly, the long-latency auditory evoked potential evaluation revealed a decrease in P1 component latency; however, the latency remained significantly longer than that of the hearing children, even after nine months of cochlear implant use. It was observed that a shorter P1 latency corresponded to more evident development of auditory skills. Regarding auditory behavior, it was observed that children who could master the auditory skill of discrimination showed better results in other evaluations, both behavioral and electrophysiological, than those who had mastered only the speech-detection skill. Therefore, cochlear implant auditory stimulation facilitated auditory pathway maturation, which decreased the latency of the P1 component and advanced the development of auditory and speech skills. The analysis of the long-latency auditory evoked potentials revealed that the P1 component was an important biomarker of auditory development during the rehabilitation process.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantsAcoustic StimulationAuditory CortexAuditory PathwaysCase-Control StudiesChild, PreschoolEvoked Potentials, AuditoryFemaleHearingHearing Loss, SensorineuralHumansInfantLongitudinal StudiesMaleReaction TimeSpeech

Identifiers

PMID28151961
PMCPMC5289550
OpenAlexW2584411211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.