Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28151957›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2017

Correlation-based model of artificially induced plasticity in motor cortex by a bidirectional brain-computer interface.

Guillaume Lajoie, Nedialko I Krouchev, John F Kalaska, Adrienne L Fairhall, Eberhard E Fetz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Guillaume LajoieUniversity of Washington Institute for Neuroengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Nedialko I KrouchevMontreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7800-0911
John F KalaskaGroupe de recherche sur le système nerveux central, Département de neurosciences, Université de Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Adrienne L FairhallUniversity of Washington Institute for Neuroengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Eberhard E FetzUniversity of Washington Institute for Neuroengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.

Funding

Washington National Primate Research CenterP51OD010425 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Mari Ostendorf · 2012 to 2026
$201.8M
NEURAL CONTROL OF MUSCLE ACTIVITYR01NS012542 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI FETZ, EBERHARD E, PERLMUTTER, STEVE I · 1985 to 2022
$8.7M
NEURAL CONTROL OF MUSCLE ACTIVITYR37NS012542 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI FETZ, EBERHARD E · 2006 to 2012
$4.5M
CIHR MOP-84454CIHR PJT-148844CIHR RGP0049/2009-CNIH HHS P51 OD010425NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS012542NINDS NIH HHS R37 NS012542
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Experiments show that spike-triggered stimulation performed with Bidirectional Brain-Computer-Interfaces (BBCI) can artificially strengthen connections between separate neural sites in motor cortex (MC). When spikes from a neuron recorded at one MC site trigger stimuli at a second target site after a fixed delay, the connections between sites eventually strengthen. It was also found that effective spike-stimulus delays are consistent with experimentally derived spike-timing-dependent plasticity (STDP) rules, suggesting that STDP is key to drive these changes. However, the impact of STDP at the level of circuits, and the mechanisms governing its modification with neural implants remain poorly understood. The present work describes a recurrent neural network model with probabilistic spiking mechanisms and plastic synapses capable of capturing both neural and synaptic activity statistics relevant to BBCI conditioning protocols. Our model successfully reproduces key experimental results, both established and new, and offers mechanistic insights into spike-triggered conditioning. Using analytical calculations and numerical simulations, we derive optimal operational regimes for BBCIs, and formulate predictions concerning the efficacy of spike-triggered conditioning in different regimes of cortical activity.

Indexed as

Brain-Computer InterfacesModels, NeurologicalModels, StatisticalComputer SimulationFeedback, PhysiologicalHumansMotor CortexNeurofeedbackNeuronal PlasticityStatistics as Topic

Identifiers

PMID28151957
PMCPMC5313237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.