Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28150789›Full record

ArticleNature2017

Consider drug efficacy before first-in-human trials.

Jonathan Kimmelman, Carole Federico

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Animals in Respiratory Research.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Era of the 4D animal model.Animal models and experimental medicine · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Moving towards less biased research.BMJ open science · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Levelling the Translational Gap for Animal to Human Efficacy Data.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2020
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jonathan Kimmelman
Carole Federico

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

AnimalsClinical Trials as TopicDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsEthics, ResearchFranceHealthy VolunteersHumansMaleMiceModels, AnimalPatient SafetyResearch DesignRisk AssessmentTreatment Failure

Identifiers

PMID28150789

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.