ArticleScientific reports2017
Field background odour should be taken into account when formulating a pest attractant based on plant volatiles.
Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.
- Synergistic attraction: Development and field evaluation of a multicomponent lure for Zeugodacus cucurbitae based on host-plant volatiles and gut bacterium-derived volatiles.Pest management science · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Plant Volatile Organic Compounds Attractive toInsects · 2025Article
- Phenological stage dependent sensory and behavioral responses of Zeugodacus cucurbitae (Coquillett) to cucurbit volatiles.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
- Field evaluation of electrophysiologically-active dung volatiles as chemical lures for trapping of dung beetles.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Elicitor-Induced VOC Emission by Grapevine Leaves: Characterisation in the Vineyard.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Article
- Variation in the ratio of compounds in a plant volatile blend during transmission by wind.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Effect of Soybean Volatiles on the Behavior of the Bean Bug, Riptortus pedestris.Journal of chemical ecology · 2022Article
- Involvement of three chemosensory proteins in perception of host plant volatiles in the tea green leafhopper,Frontiers in physiology · 2022Article
- Impact of Background Fruit Odors on Attraction of Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae) to Its Symbiotic Yeast.Journal of insect science (Online) · 2021Article
- Electrophysiological and Behavioral Responses ofInsects · 2021Article
- Flower Production, Headspace Volatiles, Pollen Nutrients, and Florivory inFrontiers in plant science · 2020Article
- Biogenic Volatile Compounds for Plant Disease Diagnosis and Health Improvement.The plant pathology journal · 2018Review
- The Ratio between Field Attractive and Background Volatiles Encodes Host-Plant Recognition in a Specialist Moth.Frontiers in plant science · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Attractants for pest monitoring and controlling can be developed based on plant volatiles. Previously, we showed that tea leafhopper (Empoasca onukii) preferred grapevine, peach plant, and tea plant odours to clean air. In this research, we formulated three blends with similar attractiveness to leafhoppers as peach, grapevine, and tea plant volatiles; these blends were composed of (Z)-3-hexenyl acetate, (E)-ocimene, (E)-4,8-dimethyl-1,3,7-nonatriene, benzaldehyde, and ethyl benzoate. Based on these five compounds, we developed two attractants, formula-P and formula-G. The specific component relative to tea plant volatiles in formula-P was benzaldehyde, and that in formula-G was ethyl benzoate. These two compounds played a role in attracting leafhoppers. In laboratory assays, the two attractants were more attractive than tea plant volatiles to the leafhoppers, and had a similar level of attractiveness. However, the leafhoppers were not attracted to formula-P in the field. A high concentration of benzaldehyde was detected in the background odour of the tea plantations. In laboratory tests, benzaldehyde at the field concentration was attractive to leafhoppers. Our results indicate that the field background odour can interfere with a point-releasing attractant when their components overlap, and that a successful attractant must differ from the field background odour.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.