ArticleInfection2017
Bibles as a possible source of pathogens in hospitals? A pilot observation.
Article in Infection, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
It is a century-old tradition of furnishing Bibles in the bedside drawers of hospitalized patients. But since the books cannot be disinfected, it might be possible that bacterial pathogens survive on the bibles. The aim of this study was to determine whether Bibles in patient's rooms can act as a vehicle for the spread of nosocomial infections from one to the next patient. We took samples from 50 Bibles in various general wards of the hospital. During the same period, we took contact samples of 99 hymnals from the hospital chapel. The hospital chapel is visited by patients from all departments of the hospital. As expected, microorganisms were detected on all books. They were mainly apathogenic organisms. Molds (Aspergillus spp.) were identified on the surfaces of five books. Two Bibles showed pathogen bacteria in a low number. No invasive infections with those pathogens could be documented during the investigation period, retrospectively. In conclusion, our results do not support Bibles as a possible source of nosocomial infections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
28150065What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.