Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28150035›Full record

ArticleJournal of bone and mineral metabolism2018

Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry underestimates in vivo lumbar spine bone mineral density in overweight rats.

Rim Cherif, Laurence Vico, Norbert Laroche, Mohsen Sakly, Nebil Attia, Cedric Lavet

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of bone and mineral metabolism, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Quantitative computed tomography provides improved accuracy for diagnosis of lumbar osteoporosis in patients with facet joint osteoarthritis: a cross-sectional study.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rim CherifINSERM U1059, Campus Santé Innovations, 10 Rue de la Marandière, 42270, Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, France.
Laurence VicoINSERM U1059, Campus Santé Innovations, 10 Rue de la Marandière, 42270, Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, France. vico@univ-st-etienne.fr.
Norbert LarocheINSERM U1059, Campus Santé Innovations, 10 Rue de la Marandière, 42270, Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, France.
Mohsen SaklyUR05ES02, Unité de Recherche de Physiologie Intégrée, Laboratoire de Biochimie et Nutrition Humaine, Faculté des Sciences de Bizerte, Université de Carthage, Tunis, Tunisia.
Nebil AttiaUR05ES02, Unité de Recherche de Physiologie Intégrée, Laboratoire de Biochimie et Nutrition Humaine, Faculté des Sciences de Bizerte, Université de Carthage, Tunis, Tunisia.
Cedric LavetINSERM U1059, Campus Santé Innovations, 10 Rue de la Marandière, 42270, Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, France.

Funding

French Foundation pour la Recherche Médicale DVO20081013479
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is currently the most widely used technique for measuring areal bone mineral density (BMD). However, several studies have shown inaccuracy, with either overestimation or underestimation of DXA BMD measurements in the case of overweight or obese individuals. We have designed an overweight rat model based on junk food to compare the effect of obesity on in vivo and ex vivo BMD and bone mineral content measurements. Thirty-eight 6-month old male rats were given a chow diet (n = 13) or a high fat and sucrose diet (n = 25), with the calorie amount being kept the same in the two groups, for 19 weeks. L1 BMD, L1 bone mineral content, amount of abdominal fat, and amount of abdominal lean were obtained from in vivo DXA scan. Ex vivo L1 BMD was also measured. A difference between in vivo and ex vivo DXA BMD measurements (P < 0.0001) is evidenced with an underestimation of in vivo BMD by (8.47 ± 10.54)%. This difference was found for the chow and high fat, high sucrose diets (P = 0.008), and a significant interaction between in vivo measurements, ex vivo measurements, and diet was observed (P = 0.030). Also, the data show a positive significant correlation of ex vivo BMD with body weight, perirenal fat, abdominal fat, and abdominal lean. Multiple linear regression analysis shows that body weight, abdominal fat, and abdominal lean were independently related to ex vivo BMD. DXA underestimated lumbar in vivo BMD in overweight rats, and this measurement error is related to body weight and abdominal fat. Therefore, caution must be used when one is interpreting BMD among overweight and obese individuals.

Indexed as

Absorptiometry, PhotonAnimalsBone DensityDietLinear ModelsLumbar VertebraeMaleOverweightRats, WistarBone mineral densityDual-energy X-ray absorptiometryFatOverweight ratUnderestimation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.