Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28150023›Full record

Trial reportPsychopharmacology2017

Effects of nicotine on response inhibition and interference control.

Ulrich Ettinger, Eliana Faiola, Anna-Maria Kasparbauer, Nadine Petrovsky, Raymond C K Chan, Roman Liepelt, Veena Kumari

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Psychopharmacology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. The Effects of THC and Nicotine on Attention: A Narrative Review.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Acute Effects of Nicotine on Physiological Responses and Sport Performance in Healthy Baseball Players.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Observational
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Cognitive Effects of Nicotine: Recent Progress.Current neuropharmacology · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Ulrich EttingerDepartment of Psychology, University of Bonn, Kaiser-Karl-Ring 9, 53111, Bonn, Germany. ulrich.ettinger@uni-bonn.de.
Eliana FaiolaDepartment of Psychology, University of Bonn, Kaiser-Karl-Ring 9, 53111, Bonn, Germany.
Anna-Maria KasparbauerDepartment of Psychology, University of Bonn, Kaiser-Karl-Ring 9, 53111, Bonn, Germany.
Nadine PetrovskyDepartment of Psychology, University of Bonn, Kaiser-Karl-Ring 9, 53111, Bonn, Germany.
Raymond C K ChanNeuropsychology and Applied Cognitive Neuroscience (NACN) Laboratory, CAS Key Laboratory of Mental Health, Institute of Psychology, Beijing, China.
Roman LiepeltInstitute of Psychology, German Sport University Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Veena KumariDepartment of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
University of Bonn · DEGerman Sport University Cologne · DEInstitute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences · CNKing's College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nicotine is a cholinergic agonist with known pro-cognitive effects in the domains of alerting and orienting attention. However, its effects on attentional top-down functions such as response inhibition and interference control are less well characterised. Here, we investigated the effects of 7 mg transdermal nicotine on performance on a battery of response inhibition and interference control tasks. A sample of N = 44 healthy adult non-smokers performed antisaccade, stop signal, Stroop, go/no-go, flanker, shape matching and Simon tasks, as well as the attentional network test (ANT) and a continuous performance task (CPT). Nicotine was administered in a within-subjects, double-blind, placebo-controlled design, with order of drug administration counterbalanced. Relative to placebo, nicotine led to significantly shorter reaction times on a prosaccade task and on CPT hits but did not significantly improve inhibitory or interference control performance on any task. Instead, nicotine had a negative influence in increasing the interference effect on the Simon task. Nicotine did not alter inter-individual associations between reaction times on congruent trials and error rates on incongruent trials on any task. Finally, there were effects involving order of drug administration, suggesting practice effects but also beneficial nicotine effects when the compound was administered first. Overall, our findings support previous studies showing positive effects of nicotine on basic attentional functions but do not provide direct evidence for an improvement of top-down cognitive control through acute administration of nicotine at this dose in healthy non-smokers.

Indexed as

Inhibition, PsychologicalAdministration, CutaneousAdultAttentionCognitionDouble-Blind MethodFemaleForm PerceptionHumansMaleNerve NetNicotineNicotinic AgonistsPsychomotor PerformanceReaction TimeSaccadesNicotineNicotinic AgonistsAcetylcholineAttentionCognitionExecutive functionInhibitory controlNicotine

Identifiers

PMID28150023
OpenAlexW2583456769

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.