Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28149927›Full record

ArticleUrology practice2017

The Relationship of Industry Payments to Prescribing Behavior: A Study of Degarelix and Denosumab.

Jathin Bandari, Robert M Turner, Bruce L Jacobs, David Canes, Ali Moinzadeh, Benjamin J Davies

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Urology practice, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Increasing Financial Payments From Industry to Medical Oncologists in the United States, 2014-2017.Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jathin BandariDepartment of Urology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA 15213.
Robert M TurnerDepartment of Urology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA 15213.
Bruce L JacobsDepartment of Urology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA 15213.
David CanesLahey Institute of Urology, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, MA, USA 01805.
Ali MoinzadehLahey Institute of Urology, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, MA, USA 01805.
Benjamin J DaviesDepartment of Urology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA 15213.
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center · USLahey Medical Center · US

Funding

Enriching Claims-Based Analysis of Prostate Cancer Treatment Decision MakingR03AG048091 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI JACOBS, BRUCE L. · 2014 to 2015
$228k
NIA NIH HHS R03 AG048091
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe influence of financial ties to pharmaceutical companies remains controversial. We aimed to assess a potential relationship between pharmaceutical payments and prescription patterns for degarelix and denosumab. MATERIALS AND

methodsMedicare Provider Utilization and Payment Data: Physician and Other Supplier Public Use File (Medicare B) data containing 2012 claims compared to OpenPayments (Sunshine Act) data for the second half of 2013. Urologists and medical oncologists who billed Medicare for degarelix or denosumab were cross referenced in both databases and payments were aggregated into a consolidated dataset. Adjusted beneficiary count and total Medicare reimbursement were compared according to receipt of Sunshine payment, and an association between Sunshine payment amount and total Medicare reimbursement was also assessed.

resultsOf the 160 prescribers of degarelix and 1,507 prescribers of denosumab, 91 (57%) and 854 (57%) received Sunshine payment, respectively. Degarelix prescribers who received Sunshine payment had higher median total Medicare reimbursement ($13,257 vs. $9,554,

conclusionsIn the case of degarelix and denosumab, there is a weak association between pharmaceutical company payments on prescribers' prescription behavior patterns.

Indexed as

degarelixdenosumabmedicareprescriber paymentssunshine act

Identifiers

PMID28149927
PMCPMC5279985
OpenAlexW2521578066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.