Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28149839›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2016

Soy-Based Therapeutic Baby Formulas: Testable Hypotheses Regarding the Pros and Cons.

Cara J Westmark

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Diet in treatment of autism spectrum disorders.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Cara J WestmarkDepartment of Neurology, University of Wisconsin , Madison, WI , USA.
University of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

Testing Direct Effects of mGluR5 Inhibition in an Alzheimer's Disease Mouse ModelR21AG044714 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI WESTMARK, CARA JEAN · 2013 to 2014
$408k
Testing Direct Effects of Soy Daidzein on Fragile X PhenotypesR03HD075881 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI WESTMARK, CARA JEAN · 2013 to 2014
$148k
NIA NIH HHS R21 AG044714NICHD NIH HHS R03 HD075881
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Soy-based infant formulas have been consumed in the United States since 1909, and currently constitute a significant portion of the infant formula market. There are efforts underway to generate genetically modified soybeans that produce therapeutic agents of interest with the intent to deliver those agents in a soy-based infant formula platform. The threefold purpose of this review article is to first discuss the pros and cons of soy-based infant formulas, then present testable hypotheses to discern the suitability of a soy platform for drug delivery in babies, and finally start a discussion to inform public policy on this important area of infant nutrition.

Indexed as

genetically modifiedglyphosatenecrotizing enterocolitisphytoestrogensseizuressoy-based infant formula

Identifiers

PMID28149839
PMCPMC5241282
OpenAlexW2574657851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.