ArticleInternational journal of ophthalmology2017
Six-year outcomes in neovascular age-related macular degeneration with ranibizumab.
Article in International journal of ophthalmology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Type 1 Choroidal Neovascularization Evolution by Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography: Long-Term Follow-Up.BioMed research international · 2020Trial
- Comparative quantitative analysis of optical coherence tomography angiography in varied morphologies of macular neovascularization following intravitreal conbercept and ranibizumab treatments for neovascular age‑related macular degeneration.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2024Article
- Impact of Treating Age-Related Macular Degeneration before Visual Function Is Impaired.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- [Anti-VEGF-therapy of fibrovascular and serous-vascularized pigment epithelial detachment in neovascular AMD : A retrospective five-year-analysis].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2021Article
- Evolution of treatment paradigms in neovascular age-related macular degeneration: a review of real-world evidence.The British journal of ophthalmology · 2021Review
- Importance of Treatment Duration: Unmasking Barriers and Discovering the Reasons for Undertreatment of Anti-VEGF Agents in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2021Article
- Article
- Real-World Outcomes in Patients with Diabetic Macular Edema Treated Long Term with Ranibizumab (VISION Study).Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2020Article
- Long-Term Ranibizumab Treatment in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Belgian Subanalysis from the Global Real-World LUMINOUSClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2020Article
- [Pro re nata anti-VEGF treatment results for neovascular age-related macular degeneration in routine clinical treatment: comparison of single with triple injections].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2019Article
- Real-World Visual And Clinical Outcomes For Patients With Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration Treated With Intravitreal Ranibizumab: An 8-Year Observational Cohort (AMD8).Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2019Article
- Abrupt visual loss during anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment for type 3 neovascularization.International journal of ophthalmology · 2019Article
- Exploring factors predicting changes in patients' expectations and psychosocial issues during the course of treatment with intravitreal injections for wet age-related macular degeneration.Eye (London, England) · 2018Article
- Five-year outcome of aflibercept intravitreal injection in naïve patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration using a modified treat-and-extend regimen: Results from a prospective observational study.Taiwan journal of ophthalmologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo evaluate the outcomes of ≥6y ranibizumab therapy in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD).
methodsHELIX was a retrospective, observational effectiveness study using medical records of patients treated in three clinics in Belgium. Patients had neovascular AMD and were initially treated with intravitreal ranibizumab (0.5 mg) between November 1, 2007 and October 31, 2008, had ≥6y of data available, and were treated on an ongoing, as-needed basis. Outcomes included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central retinal thickness (CRT).
resultsThe sample consisted of 88 eyes from 69 patients. Mean age was 76.4±6.5y, most patients were female (62.3%). Most eyes (62.5%) were treatment-naive, 33 previously treated eyes had received predominantly other anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents and verteporfin. Mean baseline BCVA was 57.4±12.7 ETDRS letters and CRT was 291.5±86.1 μm. On average, patients received 20.6±11.9 ranibizumab injections over the ≥6y. Intervals between injections were on average 12.7±16.1wk. Mean change in BCVA from baseline to last observation for the sample was less than one letter (-0.9±17.3 letters), with an average loss of -3.2±15.6 letters in previously treated eyes versus a gain of 0.6±18.4 letters in treatment-naïve eyes. When considering a loss of <15 letters over 6y as stabilization of disease, 75.9% of all eyes showed a positive (improvement or stabilization) outcome. Mean change in CRT from baseline to last observation for the sample was -26.9±148.4 μm with the greatest reduction observed in treatment-naive eyes.
conclusionThis retrospective study of 69 neovascular AMD patients treated for ≥6y with ranibizumab demonstrates long-term visual stabilization. In light of the natural evolution of the disease, these data confirm that ranibizumab is effective long-term under real-world conditions of heterogeneity of patients, clinicians, and centers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.