ArticlePeerJ2017
Developing the Leuven Embedded Figures Test (L-EFT): testing the stimulus features that influence embedding.
Article in PeerJ, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Psychometric Properties of the Japanese Translation of the Detail and Flexibility Questionnaire (DFlex).Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Figure disembedding facility and reduced left visual field bias are linked to the social dimension of autistic traits.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2025Article
- Embedded figures in schizophrenia: A main deficit but no specificity.Schizophrenia research. Cognition · 2022Article
- The Contribution of Shape Features and Demographic Variables to Disembedding Abilities.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Training focal lung pathology detection using an eye movement modeling example.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2021Article
- The Relation Between Autistic Traits, the Degree of Synaesthesia, and Local/Global Visual Perception.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2020Article
- Autistic traits in synaesthesia: atypical sensory sensitivity and enhanced perception of details.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2019Article
- Individual differences in object recognition.Psychological review · 2019Article
- Superior Disembedding in Children with ASD: New Tests Using Abstract, Meaningful, and 3D Contexts.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2018Article
- The Leuven Embedded Figures Test (L-EFT): measuring perception, intelligence or executive function?PeerJ · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Embedded Figures Test (EFT, developed by Witkin and colleagues (1971)) has been used extensively in research on individual differences, particularly in the study of autism spectrum disorder. The EFT was originally conceptualized as a measure of field (in)dependence, but in recent years performance on the EFT has been interpreted as a measure of local versus global perceptual style. Although many have used the EFT to measure perceptual style, relatively few have focused on understanding the stimulus features that cause a shape to become embedded. The primary aim of this work was to investigate the relation between the strength of embedding and perceptual grouping on a group level.
methodNew embedded figure stimuli (both targets and contexts) were developed in which stimulus features that may influence perceptual grouping were explicitly manipulated. The symmetry, closure and complexity of the target shape were manipulated as well as its good continuation by varying the number of lines from the target that continued into the context. We evaluated the effect of these four stimulus features on target detection in a new embedded figures task (Leuven Embedded Figures Test, L-EFT) in a group of undergraduate psychology students. The results were then replicated in a second experiment using a slightly different version of the task.
resultsStimulus features that influence perceptual grouping, especially good continuation and symmetry, clearly affected performance (lower accuracy, slower response times) on the L-EFT. Closure did not yield results in line with our predictions. DISCUSSION: These results show that some stimulus features, which are known to affect perceptual grouping, also influence how effectively a stimulus becomes embedded in different contexts. Whether these results imply that the EFT measures individual differences in perceptual grouping ability must be further investigated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.