Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28149575›Full record

ReviewJournal of thoracic disease2016

Veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: cannulation techniques.

Carlo Banfi, Matteo Pozzi, Nils Siegenthaler, Marie-Eve Brunner, Didier Tassaux, Jean-Francois Obadia, Karim Bendjelid, Raphaël Giraud

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of thoracic disease, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 104 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. National Heart Center Perfusion Guidelines.Saudi medical journal · 2026
    Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Observational
  17. Observational
  18. Abnormal stenosis of a drainage cannula due to excessive negative pressure during venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation management: a case report.Journal of artificial organs : the official journal of the Japanese Society for Artificial Organs · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Carlo BanfiDivision of Cardiovascular Surgery, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland;; Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland;; Geneva Hemodynamic Research Group, Geneva, Switzerland.
Matteo PozziDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, "Louis Pradel" Cardiologic Hospital, "Claude Bernard" University, Lyon, France.
Nils SiegenthalerFaculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland;; Geneva Hemodynamic Research Group, Geneva, Switzerland;; Intensive Care Service, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.
Marie-Eve BrunnerIntensive Care Service, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.
Didier TassauxIntensive Care Service, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.
Jean-Francois ObadiaDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, "Louis Pradel" Cardiologic Hospital, "Claude Bernard" University, Lyon, France.
Karim BendjelidFaculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland;; Geneva Hemodynamic Research Group, Geneva, Switzerland;; Intensive Care Service, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.
Raphaël GiraudFaculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland;; Geneva Hemodynamic Research Group, Geneva, Switzerland;; Intensive Care Service, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.
University Hospital of Geneva · CHHôpital Louis Pradel · FRUniversity of Geneva · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) technology allows a new approach for the intensive care management of acute cardiac and/or respiratory failure in adult patients who are not responsive to conventional treatment. Current ECMO therapies provide a variety of options for the multidisciplinary teams who are involved in the management of these critically ill patients. In this regard, veno-venous ECMO (VV-ECMO) can provide quite complete respiratory support, even if this highly complex technique presents substantial risks, such as bleeding, thromboembolic events and infection. While VV-ECMO circuits usually include the cannulation of two vessels (double cannulation) in its classic configuration, the use of a single cannula is now possible for VV-ECMO support. Recently, experienced centers have employed more advanced approaches by cannulating three vessels (triple cannulation) which follows veno-arterio-venous (VAV) or veno-arterio-pulmonary-arterial cannulation (VAPa). However, 'triple' cannulation expands the field of application but increases the complexity of ECMO systems. In the present review, the authors focus on the indications for VV-ECMO, patient assessment prior to cannulation, the role of ultrasound-guided vessel puncture, double lumen single bicaval cannulations, and finally triple cannulation in VV-ECMO.

Indexed as

Respiratory failureveno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO)

Identifiers

PMID28149575
PMCPMC5227239
OpenAlexW2568419160

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.