ArticleJournal of clinical and experimental dentistry2017
Citotoxicity evaluation of three dental adhesives on vero cells
Article in Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cytocompatibility assessment of an anaerobic adhesive for use in implant dentistry: An in vitro study.Journal of advanced periodontology & implant dentistry · 2026Article
- Effects of universal adhesives on dentin matrix proteins, matrix metalloproteinases and cytokine release of human pulp cells.Odontology · 2026Article
- Article
- Synthesis and Antileishmanial Evaluation ofACS omega · 2025Article
- A Novel Graphite Fluoride/Bioactive Glass-containing Orthodontic Primer with Antibacterial and Remineralization Properties: An In-vitro Study.The journal of adhesive dentistry · 2024Article
- Analysis of dentin wear and biological properties promoted by experimental inoffice desensitizing materials.BMC oral health · 2024Article
- Antibacterial and Cytotoxicity of Root Canal Sealer with the Addition of Chitosan Nanoparticle at Various Concentrations.European journal of dentistry · 2023Article
- Potential Ophthalmological Application of Extracts Obtained from Tuna Vitreous Humor Using Lactic Acid-Based Deep Eutectic Systems.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Morpho-functional effects of different universal dental adhesives on human gingival fibroblasts: an in vitro study.Odontology · 2021Article
- Influence of polymerization method on the cytotoxicity of three different denture base acrylic resins polymerized in different methods.Saudi journal of biological sciences · 2020Article
- Polyphasic Validation of a Nisin-Biogel to Control Canine Periodontal Disease.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Comparison of diffusion, cytotoxicity and tissue inflammatory reactions of four commercial bleaching products against human dental pulp stem cells.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Cytotoxicity Evaluation of Endodontic Pins on L929 Cell Line.BioMed research international · 2019Article
- Methacrylate saccharide-based monomers for dental adhesive systems.International journal of adhesion & adhesives · 2018Article
- Effect of heat treatment on cytotoxicity of self-adhesive resin cements: Cell viability analysis.European journal of dentistryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo evaluate, MATERIAL AND
methodsThe cells were cultured in a concentration of 2 x 105 cells/mL for 24h and grown to sub-confluent monolayers. VERO cells were exposed to 25µl of conditioned extracts obtained from 24h, 48h and 72h immersion of adhesive samples in culture medium (DMEM), immediately after polymerization. Fresh DMEM was used as negative control. Cell metabolism was evaluated by the MTT assay (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2, 5diphenyl-tetrazolium bromide). The data were analyzed statistically by ANOVA, considering a significance of 5%.
resultsThe values of cell viability ranged from 94.2% at 72h (SBU) to 109.6% at 48h (SB). The mean percentage of viability after exposure to the extracts of SB, SSAB and SBU were 103.2%, 100.63% and 97.43%, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference (
conclusionsAt all exposure times, all adhesives tested in this study presented no cytotoxicity to Vero cells
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.