ArticleJournal of human kinetics2016
The muscle-mechanical compromise framework: Implications for the scaling of gait and posture.
Article in Journal of human kinetics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- The functions of leg muscles, structures and mechanisms in running.Biology letters · 2024Article
- Changes in Key Biomechanical Parameters According to the Expertise Level in Runners at Different Running Speeds.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Why are the fastest runners of intermediate size? Contrasting scaling of mechanical demands and muscle supply of work and power.Biology letters · 2020Article
- An extension to the collisional model of the energetic cost of support qualitatively explains trotting and the trot-canter transition.Journal of experimental zoology. Part A, Ecological and integrative physiology · 2020Article
- The scaling or ontogeny of human gait kinetics and walk-run transition: The implications of work vs. peak power minimization.Journal of biomechanics · 2018Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Many aspects of animal and human gait and posture cannot be predicted from purely mechanical work minimization or entirely based on optimizing muscle efficiency. Here, the Muscle-Mechanical Compromise Framework is introduced as a conceptual paradigm for considering the interactions and compromises between these two objectives. Current assumptions in implementing the Framework are presented. Implications of the compromise are discussed and related to the scaling of running mechanics and animal posture.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.