Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28149276›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in computational neuroscience2016

A Spiking Neurocomputational Model of High-Frequency Oscillatory Brain Responses to Words and Pseudowords.

Max Garagnani, Guglielmo Lucchese, Rosario Tomasello, Thomas Wennekers, Friedemann Pulvermüller

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in computational neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Influence of language on perception and concept formation in a brain-constrained deep neural network model.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. From Toxoplasmosis to SchizophreniaFrontiers in psychiatry · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Max GaragnaniDepartment of Computing, Goldsmiths, University of LondonLondon, UK; Brain Language Laboratory, Department of Philosophy and Humanities, Freie Universität BerlinBerlin, Germany.
Guglielmo LuccheseBrain Language Laboratory, Department of Philosophy and Humanities, Freie Universität Berlin Berlin, Germany.
Rosario TomaselloBrain Language Laboratory, Department of Philosophy and Humanities, Freie Universität BerlinBerlin, Germany; Berlin School of Mind and Brain, Humboldt Universität zu BerlinBerlin, Germany.
Thomas WennekersCentre for Robotics and Neural Systems, University of Plymouth Plymouth, UK.
Friedemann PulvermüllerBrain Language Laboratory, Department of Philosophy and Humanities, Freie Universität BerlinBerlin, Germany; Berlin School of Mind and Brain, Humboldt Universität zu BerlinBerlin, Germany.
Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin · DEFreie Universität Berlin · DEGoldsmiths University of London · GBUniversity of Plymouth · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_U105580445
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Experimental evidence indicates that neurophysiological responses to well-known meaningful sensory items and symbols (such as familiar objects, faces, or words) differ from those to matched but novel and senseless materials (unknown objects, scrambled faces, and pseudowords). Spectral responses in the high beta- and gamma-band have been observed to be generally stronger to familiar stimuli than to unfamiliar ones. These differences have been hypothesized to be caused by the activation of distributed neuronal circuits or cell assemblies, which act as long-term memory traces for learned familiar items only. Here, we simulated word learning using a biologically constrained neurocomputational model of the left-hemispheric cortical areas known to be relevant for language and conceptual processing. The 12-area spiking neural-network architecture implemented replicates physiological and connectivity features of primary, secondary, and higher-association cortices in the frontal, temporal, and occipital lobes of the human brain. We simulated elementary aspects of word learning in it, focussing specifically on semantic grounding in action and perception. As a result of spike-driven Hebbian synaptic plasticity mechanisms, distributed, stimulus-specific cell-assembly (CA) circuits spontaneously emerged in the network. After training, presentation of one of the learned "word" forms to the model correlate of primary auditory cortex induced periodic bursts of activity within the corresponding CA, leading to oscillatory phenomena in the entire network and spontaneous across-area neural synchronization. Crucially, Morlet wavelet analysis of the network's responses recorded during presentation of learned meaningful "word" and novel, senseless "pseudoword" patterns revealed stronger induced spectral power in the gamma-band for the former than the latter, closely mirroring differences found in neurophysiological data. Furthermore, coherence analysis of the simulated responses uncovered dissociated category specific patterns of synchronous oscillations in distant cortical areas, including indirectly connected primary sensorimotor areas. Bridging the gap between cellular-level mechanisms, neuronal-population behavior, and cognitive function, the present model constitutes the first spiking, neurobiologically, and anatomically realistic model able to explain high-frequency oscillatory phenomena indexing language processing on the basis of dynamics and competitive interactions of distributed cell-assembly circuits which emerge in the brain as a result of Hebbian learning and sensorimotor experience.

Indexed as

cell assemblygamma bandHebbian learninglanguageneural networksimulationsynchrony

Identifiers

PMID28149276
PMCPMC5241316
OpenAlexW2575919738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.