ArticleAnnals of burns and fire disasters2016
Statistical and clinical analysis of alterations in glucose values after burns.
Article in Annals of burns and fire disasters, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate independent factors (mainly critical hyperglycaemic values on admission) with an impact on outcome in burn patients (sepsis and mortality) and analyse prevalence of critical hyperglycaemia on admission and during burn disease in adult and elderly patients with severe burns. This was an observational retrospective cohort study involving burn patients (≥ 20 years old) hospitalized in the ICU of the Burn Facility in Albania during 2010-2014. Patients were categorized as having euglycaemia, moderate or critical hyperglycaemia. Regression analysis, hyperglycaemia prediction test and risk measurement were performed for the population. Statistical significance for SIH was only found for glucose values on admission, presence of diabetes and BMI. Using 180 mg/dl as cut off for critical hyperglycaemia, we found that this test had a sensitivity of 66.67% (95% CI: 44.68% to 84.33%), specificity of 88.20% (95% CI: 84.16% to 91.51%), PPV of 29.63% (95% CI: 17.99% to 43.61%) and NPV of 97.26% (95% CI: 94.67% to 98.81%). Statistical significance was found for patients with critical hyperglycaemia on admission regarding relative and absolute risk measures for sepsis and mortality. Glucose values on admission, as one of the derangement features of burn shock, are prognostic factors in critical hyperglycaemia during disease, and have a close relationship with other outcomes (sepsis and mortality).
Indexed as
Identifiers
28149243PMC5266231W2585529971What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.