Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28149179›Full record

ArticleSaudi journal of biological sciences2017

Characteristics of antibacterial molecular activities in

Wanxi Peng, Dongli Li, Minglong Zhang, Shengbo Ge, Bo Mo, Shasha Li, Makoto Ohkoshi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Saudi journal of biological sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Food science & nutrition · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Neuroprotective Effect ofFrontiers in neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  10. Network Pharmacology Study onInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Journal of toxicology · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Wanxi PengSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, Central South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha, China; Laboratory of Biomaterials Science, Kyoto Prefectural University, Kyoto, Japan.
Dongli LiSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, Central South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha, China.
Minglong ZhangSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, Central South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha, China.
Shengbo GeSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, Central South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha, China.
Bo MoSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, Central South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha, China.
Shasha LiSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, Central South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha, China.
Makoto OhkoshiLaboratory of Biomaterials Science, Kyoto Prefectural University, Kyoto, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As one of the dominant plantations in north and central China, poplar was considered as the uppermost wood raw materials, however, the chemical constituents of poplar wood weren't effectively used by high added value. Therefore, the molecules of wood extractives in

Indexed as

Antibacterial moleculesGC–MSPoplarWood extractivesWoody activities

Identifiers

PMID28149179
PMCPMC5272933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.