ArticleThe Journal of rheumatology2017
Attitudes and Approaches for Withdrawing Drugs for Children with Clinically Inactive Nonsystemic JIA: A Survey of the Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance.
Article in The Journal of rheumatology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.
- PAFLAR guidelines for oligoarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis.Clinical rheumatology · 2026Guideline
- Treatment Withdrawal Following Remission in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: A Systematic Review of the Literature.Paediatric drugs · 2019Pooled it
- Article
- Evaluation of adalimumab tapering regimens in children and adolescents with juvenile idiopathic arthritis in remission: a simulation study.Pediatric rheumatology online journal · 2026Article
- Early Anti-Drug Antibodies Predict Adalimumab Response in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Anti-tumor necrosis factor (aTNF) weaning strategy in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA): does duration matter?Clinical rheumatology · 2024Article
- What matters most to pediatric rheumatologists in deciding whether to discontinue biologics in a child with juvenile idiopathic arthritis? A best-worst scaling survey.Clinical rheumatology · 2023Article
- Withdrawing biologics in non-systemic JIA: what matters to pediatric rheumatologists?Pediatric rheumatology online journal · 2023Article
- Successful stopping of biologic therapy for remission in children and young people with juvenile idiopathic arthritis.Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
- Article
- Tapering of biological treatment in autoinflammatory diseases: a scoping review.Pediatric rheumatology online journal · 2022Article
- Prevention of disease flares by risk-adapted stratification of therapy withdrawal in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: results from the PREVENT-JIA trial.Annals of the rheumatic diseases · 2022Article
- Torticollis as a Sole Presentation of Spondyloarthritis in a 4-Year-Old Child.Clinical medicine & research · 2021Article
- Clinical remission and subsequent relapse in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: predictive factors according to therapeutic approach.Pediatric rheumatology online journal · 2021Observational
- Re-treatment with etanercept is as effective as the initial firstline treatment in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis.Arthritis research & therapy · 2021Article
- Making Decisions About Stopping Medicines for Well-Controlled Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: A Mixed-Methods Study of Patients and Caregivers.Arthritis care & research · 2021Article
- Similarities and Differences Between Juvenile and Adult Spondyloarthropathies.Frontiers in medicine · 2021Review
- [Biologics in the treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis : A comparison of mono- and combination therapy with synthetic DMARDs].Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo assess the attitudes and strategies of pediatric rheumatology clinicians toward withdrawing medications for children with clinically inactive juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA).
methodsMembers of the Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance (CARRA) completed an anonymous electronic survey on decision making and approaches for withdrawing medications for inactive nonsystemic JIA. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics.
resultsOf 388 clinicians in CARRA, 124 completed surveys (32%), predominantly attending pediatric rheumatologists. The most highly ranked factors in decision making for withdrawing medications were the duration of clinical inactivity, drug toxicity, duration of prior activity, patient/family preferences, joint damage, and JIA category. Diagnoses of rheumatoid factor-positive polyarthritis and persistent oligoarthritis made respondents less likely and more likely, respectively, to withdraw JIA medications. Three-quarters of respondents waited for 6-12 months of inactive disease before stopping methotrexate (MTX) or biologics, but preferences varied. There was also considerable variability in the strategies used to reduce, taper, or stop medications for clinically inactive JIA; most commonly, clinicians reported slow medication tapers lasting at least 2 months. For children receiving combination MTX-biologic therapy, 63% of respondents preferred stopping MTX first. Most clinicians reported using imaging only seldom or sometimes to guide decision making, but most were also reluctant to withdraw medications in the presence of asymptomatic imaging abnormalities suggestive of subclinical inflammation.
conclusionConsiderable variability exists among pediatric rheumatology clinicians regarding when and how to withdraw medications for children with clinically inactive JIA. More research is needed to identify the most effective approaches to withdraw medications and predictors of outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.