Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28148696›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of rheumatology2017

Attitudes and Approaches for Withdrawing Drugs for Children with Clinically Inactive Nonsystemic JIA: A Survey of the Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance.

Daniel B Horton, Karen B Onel, Timothy Beukelman, Sarah Ringold

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of rheumatology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel B HortonFrom the Division of Pediatric Rheumatology, Department of Pediatrics, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Institute for Health, Health Care Policy and Aging Research, Rutgers Biomedical and Health Sciences, New Brunswick, New Jersey; Division of Pediatric Rheumatology, Department of Pediatrics, Hospital for Special Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York; Division of Pediatric Rheumatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama; Seattle Children's Hospital and Research Institute, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA. daniel.horton@rutgers.edu.
Karen B OnelFrom the Division of Pediatric Rheumatology, Department of Pediatrics, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Institute for Health, Health Care Policy and Aging Research, Rutgers Biomedical and Health Sciences, New Brunswick, New Jersey; Division of Pediatric Rheumatology, Department of Pediatrics, Hospital for Special Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York; Division of Pediatric Rheumatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama; Seattle Children's Hospital and Research Institute, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Timothy BeukelmanFrom the Division of Pediatric Rheumatology, Department of Pediatrics, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Institute for Health, Health Care Policy and Aging Research, Rutgers Biomedical and Health Sciences, New Brunswick, New Jersey; Division of Pediatric Rheumatology, Department of Pediatrics, Hospital for Special Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York; Division of Pediatric Rheumatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama; Seattle Children's Hospital and Research Institute, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Sarah RingoldFrom the Division of Pediatric Rheumatology, Department of Pediatrics, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Institute for Health, Health Care Policy and Aging Research, Rutgers Biomedical and Health Sciences, New Brunswick, New Jersey; Division of Pediatric Rheumatology, Department of Pediatrics, Hospital for Special Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York; Division of Pediatric Rheumatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama; Seattle Children's Hospital and Research Institute, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Hospital for Special Surgery · USRutgers HealthUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · US

Funding

Drugs, Germs, and Joints: Antibiotics, Gut Microbiota, and Juvenile Idiopathic ArthritisK23AR070286 · NIAMS · RBHS-ROBERT WOOD JOHNSON MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI HORTON, DANIEL BENJAMIN · 2016 to 2020
$909k
NIAMS NIH HHS K23 AR070286NIAMS NIH HHS L40 AR070497
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the attitudes and strategies of pediatric rheumatology clinicians toward withdrawing medications for children with clinically inactive juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA).

methodsMembers of the Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance (CARRA) completed an anonymous electronic survey on decision making and approaches for withdrawing medications for inactive nonsystemic JIA. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics.

resultsOf 388 clinicians in CARRA, 124 completed surveys (32%), predominantly attending pediatric rheumatologists. The most highly ranked factors in decision making for withdrawing medications were the duration of clinical inactivity, drug toxicity, duration of prior activity, patient/family preferences, joint damage, and JIA category. Diagnoses of rheumatoid factor-positive polyarthritis and persistent oligoarthritis made respondents less likely and more likely, respectively, to withdraw JIA medications. Three-quarters of respondents waited for 6-12 months of inactive disease before stopping methotrexate (MTX) or biologics, but preferences varied. There was also considerable variability in the strategies used to reduce, taper, or stop medications for clinically inactive JIA; most commonly, clinicians reported slow medication tapers lasting at least 2 months. For children receiving combination MTX-biologic therapy, 63% of respondents preferred stopping MTX first. Most clinicians reported using imaging only seldom or sometimes to guide decision making, but most were also reluctant to withdraw medications in the presence of asymptomatic imaging abnormalities suggestive of subclinical inflammation.

conclusionConsiderable variability exists among pediatric rheumatology clinicians regarding when and how to withdraw medications for children with clinically inactive JIA. More research is needed to identify the most effective approaches to withdraw medications and predictors of outcomes.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelClinical Decision-MakingAntirheumatic AgentsArthritis, JuvenileChildFemaleHealth Care SurveysHumansMaleMethotrexateRemission InductionRheumatologyTreatment OutcomeAntirheumatic AgentsMethotrexateCLINICAL DECISION MAKINGCLINICAL INACTIVE DISEASEJUVENILE IDIOPATHIC ARTHRITISPEDIATRIC RHEUMATIC DISEASES

Identifiers

PMID28148696
PMCPMC5334187
OpenAlexW2585119307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.