Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28148245›Full record

ArticleBMC family practice2017

From practice employee to (co-)owner: young GPs predict their future careers: a cross-sectional survey.

Luzia Birgit Gisler, Marius Bachofner, Cora Nina Moser-Bucher, Nathalie Scherz, Sven Streit

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC family practice, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Luzia Birgit GislerInstitute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Gesellschaftsstrasse 49, 3012, Bern, Switzerland.
Marius BachofnerFamily practice, Nottwil, Switzerland.
Cora Nina Moser-BucherCenter for Primary Care Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Nathalie ScherzInstitute of Primary Care, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Sven StreitInstitute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Gesellschaftsstrasse 49, 3012, Bern, Switzerland. sven.streit@biham.unibe.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3813-4616

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn Switzerland, the mean age of GPs in 1993 was 46. In 2015, it had increased to 55, and GPs over 65 made up 15% of the workforce of the about 6000 GPs. As older, self-employed GPs retire, young doctors will be needed to fill their positions and eventually take over their practices. We set out to determine what kind of employment young GPs wanted, if they thought their preference would change over time, and the working conditions and factors most important in their choice of practice.

methodsWe administered a cross-sectional online survey to members of the Swiss Young General Practitioners Association (n = 443). Our survey relied on closed questions, ratings of attractiveness of fictional job ads, and an open question to capture participants' characteristics, and their preferred type of practice and working conditions.

resultsWe received 270 (61%) replies. Most were women (71%) and wanted to work in the suburbs or countryside in small GP-owned group practices, with up to five colleagues. Most intended to work part-time: mean desired workload was 78% for men and 66% for women. Positive working climate was a major factor in choosing a GP practice. Most participants projected a career arc from employment to ownership or co-ownership of a practice within five years; only 7-9% preferred to remain employees.

conclusionsYoung and future GPs in Switzerland want to work part-time in small, GP-owned group practices. Practices should offer them employment opportunities with a path to (co-)ownership.

Indexed as

Job SatisfactionSurveys and QuestionnairesAdultCareer ChoiceCross-Sectional StudiesEmploymentFamily PracticeFemaleForecastingGeneral PractitionersHumansMaleMiddle AgedOccupational HealthPractice Patterns, Physicians'Predictive Value of TestsFuture generationGeneral practicePractice

Identifiers

PMID28148245
PMCPMC5289023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.