Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28146584›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Adherence to hypertension medication: Quantitative and qualitative investigations in a rural Northern Vietnamese community.

Thi-Phuong-Lan Nguyen, Catharina C M Schuiling-Veninga, Thi Bach Yen Nguyen, Thu-Hang Vu, E Pamela Wright, Maarten J Postma

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Associated Factors of Hypertension in Women and Men in Vietnam: A Cross-Sectional Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Thi-Phuong-Lan NguyenDepartment of Pharmacy, Unit of PharmacoTherapy, -Epidemiology & -Economics (PTE2), University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Catharina C M Schuiling-VeningaDepartment of Pharmacy, Unit of PharmacoTherapy, -Epidemiology & -Economics (PTE2), University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Thi Bach Yen NguyenDepartment of Health Economics, Ha Noi University of Medicine, Ha Noi, Vietnam.
Thu-Hang VuThai Nguyen University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Thai Nguyen, Vietnam.
E Pamela WrightMedical Committee Netherlands-Vietnam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Maarten J PostmaDepartment of Pharmacy, Unit of PharmacoTherapy, -Epidemiology & -Economics (PTE2), University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
University of Groningen · NLUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLMRC Holland (Netherlands) · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe purposes of this study were to assess the adherence to medication of hypertensive patients visiting community health stations in a rural area in Vietnam, to examine the relationship between levels of adherence and cardiovascular risk among hypertensive patients and to further understand factors influencing adherence.

methodsThis study is part of a prospective one-year study conducted on hypertension management in a population aged 35 to 64 years. Data on age, sex, blood pressure and blood test results were collected at baseline. Cardiovascular risk was based on the Cardiovascular Risk Prediction Model for populations in Asia. To calculate medication adherence, the number of days the drug was taken was divided by the number of days since the first day of the prescription. A threshold of 80% was applied to differentiate between adherence and non-adherence. In-depth interviews were conducted among 18 subjects, including subjects classified as adherent and as non-adherent.

resultsAmong 315 patients analyzed, 49.8% of the patients were adherent. Qualitative investigation revealed discrepancies in classification of adherence and non-adherence based on quantitative analysis and interviews. No significant difference in medication compliance between two cardiovascular disease risk groups (<10% vs. >10% risk) was found, also not after controlling for age, sex, and ethnicity (adjusted odds ratio at 1.068; 95% CI: 0.614 to 1.857). The odds of medication adherence in females was 1.531 times higher than in males but the difference was not statistically significant (95% CI: 0.957 to 2.448). Each one-year increase in age resulted in patients being 1.036 times more likely to be compliant (95% CI: 1.002 to 1.072). Awareness of complications related to hypertension was given as the main reason for adherence to therapy.

conclusionsMedication adherence rate was relatively low among hypertensive subjects. The data suggest that rather than risk profile, the factor of age should be considered for guiding the choice on who to target for improving medication adherence.

Indexed as

Antihypertensive AgentsMedication AdherenceRural PopulationAdultCardiovascular DiseasesFemaleHumansHypertensionMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesPublic Health SurveillanceQualitative ResearchSocioeconomic FactorsVietnamAntihypertensive Agents

Identifiers

PMID28146584
PMCPMC5287477
OpenAlexW2583802073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.