Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28146578›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2017

AlncRNA HULC as an effective biomarker for surveillance of the outcome of cancer: A meta-analysis.

Xiaoliang Chen, Jinbo Lin, Yi Liu, Ji Peng, Yong Cao, Zhan Su, Tieqiang Wang, Jinquan Cheng, Dongsheng Hu

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. LncRNA HULC mediates radioresistance via autophagy in prostate cancer cells.Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica · 2018
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Xiaoliang ChenShenzhen Guangming district center for disease control and prevention, Shenzhen, Guangdong, P.R. China.
Jinbo LinLonggang district central hospital of Shenzhen, Shenzhen, Guangdong, P.R. China.
Yi LiuShenzhen Guangming district center for disease control and prevention, Shenzhen, Guangdong, P.R. China.
Ji PengShenzhen Center for Chronic Disease Prevention, Shenzhen, Guangdong, P.R. China.
Yong CaoShenzhen Guangming district center for disease control and prevention, Shenzhen, Guangdong, P.R. China.
Zhan SuShenzhen Guangming district center for disease control and prevention, Shenzhen, Guangdong, P.R. China.
Tieqiang WangShenzhen Guangming district center for disease control and prevention, Shenzhen, Guangdong, P.R. China.
Jinquan ChengDepartment of Molecular Biology, Shenzhen Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shenzhen, Guangdong, P.R. China.
Dongsheng HuSchool of Medicine, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, P.R. China.
Shenzhen Center for Disease Control and Prevention · CNLonggang Central Hospital · CNShenzhen University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeHigh expression of highly upregulated in iver cancer (HULC) has been found associated with increased metastasis and poor prognosis with cancer. This meta-analysis aimed to determine the pooled effect of HULC on metastasis and prognosis of cancers.

methodThe studies were accessed using multiple databases. RevMan5.3 and STATA14.0 were used to estimate pooled effects, the heterogeneity among studies, and publication bias for the association of HULC and overall survival (OS).

resultsA total of 9 studies of 966 cancer patients were included. Risk of lymph node metastasis was increased with high versus low HULC expression (pooled odds ratio [OR] = 4.83, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.59-14.63) as was distant metastasis (pooled OR = 5.44, 95% CI 2.33-12.74). Furthermore, OS time was shortened with high HULC expression (pooled hazard ratio [HR] = 1.48, 95% CI 1.03-2.12), especially in Chinese patients (pooled HR = 2.04, 95% CI 1.55-2.68), and risk of recurrence was increased (pooled OR = 6.68, 95% CI 2.77-16.13).

conclusionHULC might be a potential biomarker for therapy and prognosis surveillance in cancers.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansNeoplasm MetastasisNeoplasmsNeoplasm StagingOdds RatioPatient Outcome AssessmentPrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsPublication BiasRecurrenceRNA, Long NoncodingBiomarkers, TumorHULC long non-coding RNA, humanRNA, Long Noncoding

Identifiers

PMID28146578
PMCPMC5287472
OpenAlexW2584395597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.