Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28146560›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2017

A Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial of Different Mobile Messaging Interventions for Problem Drinking Compared to Weekly Drink Tracking.

Frederick Muench, Katherine van Stolk-Cooke, Alexis Kuerbis, Gertraud Stadler, Amit Baumel, Sijing Shao, James R McKay, Jon Morgenstern

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Frederick MuenchFeinstein Institute for Medical Research, Department of Psychiatry, Northwell Health Great Neck, New York, United States of America.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2483-9594
Katherine van Stolk-CookeFeinstein Institute for Medical Research, Department of Psychiatry, Northwell Health Great Neck, New York, United States of America.
Alexis KuerbisSilberman School of Social Work, Hunter College at the City University of New York, New York, United States of America.
Gertraud StadlerDepartment of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, Scotland, United Kingdom.
Amit BaumelFeinstein Institute for Medical Research, Department of Psychiatry, Northwell Health Great Neck, New York, United States of America.
Sijing ShaoFeinstein Institute for Medical Research, Department of Psychiatry, Northwell Health Great Neck, New York, United States of America.
James R McKayDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Jon MorgensternFeinstein Institute for Medical Research, Department of Psychiatry, Northwell Health Great Neck, New York, United States of America.

Funding

Tailored Mobile Text Messaging to Reduce Problem DrinkingR34AA021502 · NIAAA · NEW YORK STATE PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTE DBA RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HYGIENE, INC · PI MUENCH, FREDERICK JOHN · 2012 to 2014
$675k
NIAAA NIH HHS R34 AA021502
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionRecent evidence suggests that text messaging may help to reduce problem drinking as an extension to in-person services, but very little is known about the effectiveness of remote messaging on problem drinking as a stand-alone intervention, or how different types of messages may improve drinking outcomes in those seeking to moderate their alcohol consumption.

methodsWe conducted an exploratory, single-blind randomized controlled pilot study comparing four different types of alcohol reduction-themed text messages sent daily to weekly drink self-tracking texts in order to determine their impact on drinking outcomes over a 12-week period in 152 participants (≈ 30 per group) seeking to reduce their drinking on the internet. Messaging interventions included: weekly drink self-tracking mobile assessment texts (MA), loss-framed texts (LF), gain-framed texts (GF), static tailored texts (ST), and adaptive tailored texts (TA). Poisson and least squares regressions were used to compare differences between each active messaging group and the MA control.

resultsWhen adjusting for baseline drinking, participants in all messaging groups except GF significantly reduced the number of drinks consumed per week and the number of heavy drinking days compared to MA. Only the TA and GF groups were significantly different from MA in reducing the number of drinking days. While the TA group yielded the largest effect sizes on all outcome measures, there were no significant differences between active messaging groups on any outcome measure. 79.6% of individuals enrolled in the study wanted to continue receiving messages for an additional 12 weeks at the end of the study. DISCUSSION: Results of this pilot study indicate that remote automated text messages delivered daily can help adult problem drinkers reduce drinking frequency and quantity significantly more than once-a-week self-tracking messages only, and that tailored adaptive texts yield the largest effect sizes across outcomes compared to MA. Larger samples are needed to understand differences between messaging interventions and to target their mechanisms of efficacy.

Indexed as

Alcohol DrinkingPublic Health SurveillanceText MessagingAdultAlcoholismEarly Intervention, EducationalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID28146560
PMCPMC5287456

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.