Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28146422›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2017

MAGE expression in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma primary tumors, lymph node metastases and respective recurrences-implications for immunotherapy.

Simon Laban, Gregor Giebel, Niklas Klümper, Andreas Schröck, Johannes Doescher, Giulio Spagnoli, Julia Thierauf, Marie-Nicole Theodoraki, Romain Remark, Sacha Gnjatic and 11 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Neoadjuvant PD-1 Immune Checkpoint Blockade Reverses Functional Immunodominance among Tumor Antigen-Specific T Cells.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Simon LabanDepartment of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Head and Neck Cancer Center Ulm, University Medical Center Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Gregor GiebelDepartment of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Head and Neck Cancer Center Ulm, University Medical Center Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Niklas KlümperPathology of the University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Luebeck and the Research Center Borstel, Leibniz Center for Medicine and Biosciences, Germany.
Andreas SchröckDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Johannes DoescherDepartment of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Head and Neck Cancer Center Ulm, University Medical Center Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Giulio SpagnoliDepartment of Biomedicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Julia ThieraufDepartment of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Head and Neck Cancer Center Ulm, University Medical Center Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Marie-Nicole TheodorakiDepartment of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Head and Neck Cancer Center Ulm, University Medical Center Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Romain RemarkDepartment of Medicine, Hematology and Medical Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York City, NY, USA.
Sacha GnjaticDepartment of Medicine, Hematology and Medical Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York City, NY, USA.
Rosemarie KruparPathology of the University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Luebeck and the Research Center Borstel, Leibniz Center for Medicine and Biosciences, Germany.
Andrew G SikoraDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Geert LitjensHamamatsu Tissue Imaging and Analysis Center, BIOQUANT, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Niels GrabeHamamatsu Tissue Imaging and Analysis Center, BIOQUANT, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Glen KristiansenInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Friedrich BootzDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Patrick J SchulerDepartment of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Head and Neck Cancer Center Ulm, University Medical Center Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Cornelia BrunnerDepartment of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Head and Neck Cancer Center Ulm, University Medical Center Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Johannes BrägelmannDepartment of Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Thomas K HoffmannDepartment of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Head and Neck Cancer Center Ulm, University Medical Center Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Sven PernerPathology of the University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Luebeck and the Research Center Borstel, Leibniz Center for Medicine and Biosciences, Germany.
University Hospital Ulm · DEUniversity Hospital Bonn · DEBaylor College of Medicine · USHeidelberg University · DEMount Sinai Hospital · USUniversity Hospital of Basel · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Melanoma associated antigens (MAGE) are potential targets for immunotherapy and have been associated with poor overall survival (OS) in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). However, little is known about MAGE in lymph node metastases (LNM) and recurrent disease (RD) of HNSCC.To assess whether MAGE expression increases with metastasis or recurrence, a tissue microarray (TMA) of 552 primary tumors (PT), 219 LNM and 75 RD was evaluated by immunohistochemistry for MAGE antigens using three monoclonal antibodies to multiple MAGE family members. Mean expression intensity (MEI) was obtained from triplicates of each tumor specimen.The median MEI compared between PT, LNM and RD was significantly higher in LNM and RD. In paired samples, MEI was comparable in PT to respective LNM, but significantly different from RD. Up to 25% of patients were negative for pan-MAGE or MAGE-A3/A4 in PT, but positive in RD. The prognostic impact of MAGE expression was validated in the TMA cohort and also in TCGA data (mRNA). OS was significantly lower for patients expressing pan-MAGE or MAGE-A3/A4 in both independent cohorts.MAGE expression was confirmed as a prognostic marker in HNSCC and may be important for immunotherapeutic strategies as a shared antigen.

Indexed as

Antigens, NeoplasmCarcinoma, Squamous CellCohort StudiesFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansImmunohistochemistryImmunotherapyKaplan-Meier EstimateLymphatic MetastasisMaleMelanoma-Specific AntigensMultivariate AnalysisNeoplasm ProteinsNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalAntigens, NeoplasmMAGEA3 protein, humanMAGEA4 protein, humanMelanoma-Specific AntigensNeoplasm ProteinsRNA, Messengercancer-testis antigenshead and neck squamous cell carcinomaHNSCCMAGEmelanoma-associated antigen

Identifiers

PMID28146422
PMCPMC5362438
OpenAlexW2581557469

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.