Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28146323›Full record

ReviewInfluenza and other respiratory viruses2017

Workshop report: Immunoassay standardisation for "universal" influenza vaccines.

Sophia Pavlova, Flavia D'Alessio, Sophie Houard, Edmond J Remarque, Norbert Stockhofe, Othmar G Engelhardt

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Influenza and other respiratory viruses, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sophia PavlovaEuropean Vaccine Initiative, UniversitätsKlinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Flavia D'AlessioEuropean Vaccine Initiative, UniversitätsKlinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Sophie HouardEuropean Vaccine Initiative, UniversitätsKlinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Edmond J RemarqueBiomedical Primate Research Centre, Rijswijk, The Netherlands.
Norbert StockhofeWageningen Bioveterinary Research/Wageningen University & Re-search, Lelystad, The Netherlands.
Othmar G EngelhardtNational Institute for Biological Standards and Control, Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency, South Mimms, Potters Bar, Hertfordshire, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0465-9908

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of broadly reactive influenza vaccines raises the need to identify the most appropriate immunoassays that can be used for the evaluation of so-called universal influenza vaccines and to explore a path towards the standardisation of such assays. More than fifty experts from the global influenza vaccine research and development field met to initiate such discussion at a workshop co-organised by the EDUFLUVAC consortium, a European Union funded project coordinated by the European Vaccine Initiative, and the National Institutes of Health/National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, USA. The workshop audience agreed that it was not possible to establish a single immunoassay for "universal" influenza vaccines because the current approaches differ in the vaccines' nature and immunogenicity properties. Therefore, different scientific rationales for the immunoassay selection are required. To avoid dilution of efforts, the choice of the primary evaluation criteria (eg serological assays or T-cell assays) should drive the effort of harmonisation. However, at an early phase of clinical development, more efforts on exploratory assessments should be undertaken to better define the immune profile in response to immunisation with new vaccines. The workshop concluded that each laboratory should aim towards validation of the appropriate immunoassays used during the entire process of vaccine development from antigen discovery up to establishment of correlates of protection, including the different steps of quality control (eg potency assays), animal studies and human clinical development. Standardisation of the immunoassays is the ultimate goal, and there is a long way to go.

Indexed as

HumansImmunoassayInfluenza, HumanInfluenza VaccinesOrthomyxoviridaeInfluenza Vaccinesimmunoassayinfluenzastandardisationuniversalvaccineworkshop

Identifiers

PMID28146323
PMCPMC5410724

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.