Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28146297›Full record

ArticleAcademic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine2017

Development of a Patient-centered Outcome Measure for Emergency Department Asthma Patients.

Margaret E Samuels-Kalow, Karin V Rhodes, Mira Henien, Emily Hardy, Thomas Moore, Felicia Wong, Carlos A Camargo, Caroline T Rizzo, Cynthia Mollen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Development and validation of the Patient-Reported Outcome Measure-Older adult care Transitions from the Emergency Department (PROM-OTED) tool.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Margaret E Samuels-KalowDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.
Karin V RhodesOffice of Population Health, Hofstra Northwell School of Medicine, Great Neck, NY.
Mira HenienDrexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA.
Emily HardyDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Emergency Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA.
Thomas MooreDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Emergency Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA.
Felicia WongCollege of William & Mary, Williamsburg, VA.
Carlos A CamargoDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.
Caroline T RizzoDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.
Cynthia MollenDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Emergency Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA.

Funding

Enabling Medical Research Growth in Emergency MedicineK12HL109009 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI KIMMEL, STEPHEN E. · 2011 to 2015
$3.4M
NHLBI NIH HHS K12 HL109009
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMeasuring outcomes of emergency care is of key importance, but current metrics, such as 72-hour return visit rates, are subject to ascertainment bias, incentivize overtesting and overtreatment at initial visit, and do not reflect the full burden of disease and morbidity experienced at home following ED care. There is increasing emphasis on including patient-reported outcomes, but the existing patient-reported measures have limited applicability to emergency care.

objectiveThe objective was to identify concepts for inclusion in a patient-reported outcome measure for ED care and assess differences in potential concepts by health literacy.

methodsA three-phase qualitative study was completed using freelisting and semistructured interviewing for concept identification, member checking for concept ranking, and cognitive interviewing for question development. Participants were drawn from three tertiary care EDs. Parents of patients (pediatric) or patients (adult) with asthma completed a demographic survey and an assessment of health literacy. Phase 1 participants also completed a freelisting exercise and qualitative interview regarding the definition of success following ED discharge. Phase 2 participants completed a member checking survey based on concepts identified in Phase 1. Phase 3 was a pilot of trial questions based on the highest-ranked concepts from Phase 2.

resultsPhase 1 enrolled 22 adult patients and 37 parents of pediatric patients. Phase 2 enrolled 41 adult patients and 200 parents. Phase 3 involved 15 parents. Across all demographic/literacy groups, Phase 1 participants reported return to usual activity and lack of asthma symptoms as the most important markers of success. In Phase 2, symptom improvement, medication use and access, and asthma knowledge were identified as the most important components of the definition of post-ED discharge success. Phase 3 resulted in five questions for the proposed measure.

conclusionsA stepwise qualitative process can identify, rank, and formulate questions based on patient-identified concepts for inclusion in a patient-reported outcome measure for ED discharge. The four key concepts identified for inclusion: symptom improvement, medication access, correct medication use, and asthma knowledge are not measured by existing quality metrics.

Indexed as

Health LiteracyPatient-Centered CarePatient Reported Outcome MeasuresAdultAsthmaChildChild, PreschoolEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHumansMaleParentsPatient DischargeQualitative ResearchSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID28146297
PMCPMC5426977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.