Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28146269›Full record

ArticleClinical cardiology2017

The prevalence and management of angina among patients with chronic coronary artery disease across US outpatient cardiology practices: insights from the Angina Prevalence and Provider Evaluation of Angina Relief (APPEAR) study.

Faraz Kureshi, Ali Shafiq, Suzanne V Arnold, Kensey Gosch, Tracie Breeding, Ashwath S Kumar, Philip G Jones, John A Spertus

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cardiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Contemporary Antianginal Therapy.American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Trimetazidine in Cardiovascular Disease and Beyond: A Comprehensive Review.American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Faraz KureshiSaint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute, Kansas City, Missouri.
Ali ShafiqSaint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute, Kansas City, Missouri.
Suzanne V ArnoldSaint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute, Kansas City, Missouri.
Kensey GoschSaint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute, Kansas City, Missouri.
Tracie BreedingSaint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute, Kansas City, Missouri.
Ashwath S KumarUniversity of Missouri-Kansas City.
Philip G JonesSaint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute, Kansas City, Missouri.
John A SpertusSaint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute, Kansas City, Missouri.
Saint Luke's Hospital · USUniversity of Missouri–Kansas City · US

Funding

CARDIOVASCULAR OUTCOMES RESEARCH TRAINING PROGRAMT32HL110837 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI KANSAS CITY · PI JOHN A SPERTUS · 2012 to 2026
$5.0M
NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL110837
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although eliminating angina is a primary goal in treating patients with chronic coronary artery disease (CAD), few contemporary data quantify prevalence and severity of angina across US cardiology practices. The authors hypothesized that angina among outpatients with CAD managed by US cardiologists is low and its prevalence varies by site. Among 25 US outpatient cardiology clinics enrolled in the American College of Cardiology Practice Innovation and Clinical Excellence (PINNACLE) registry, we prospectively recruited a consecutive sample of patients with chronic CAD over a 1- to 2-week period at each site between April 2013 and July 2015, irrespective of the reason for their appointment. Eligible patients had documented history of CAD (prior acute coronary syndrome, prior coronary revascularization procedure, or diagnosis of stable angina) and ≥1 prior office visit at the practice site. Angina was assessed directly from patients using the Seattle Angina Questionnaire Angina Frequency score. Among 1257 patients from 25 sites, 7.6% (n = 96) reported daily/weekly, 25.1% (n = 315) monthly, and 67.3% (n = 846) no angina. The proportion of patients with daily/weekly angina at each site ranged from 2.0% to 24.0%, but just over half (56.3%) were on ≥2 antianginal medications, with wide variability across sites (0%-100%). One-third of outpatients with chronic CAD managed by cardiologists report having angina in the prior month, and 7.6% have frequent symptoms. Among those with frequent angina, just over half were on ≥2 antianginal medications, with wide variability across sites. These findings suggest an opportunity to improve symptom control.

Indexed as

Disease ManagementOutpatientsRegistriesAgedAngina PectorisChronic DiseaseCoronary Artery DiseaseFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMalePrevalenceProspective StudiesUnited StatesanginachronicIschemic heart disease

Identifiers

PMID28146269
PMCPMC5300688
OpenAlexW2550573619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.