SynthesisRevista de saude publica2017
Governance and mental health: contributions for public policy approach.
Synthesis in Revista de saude publica, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Editorial: Public health strategies to improve mental health in the education sector: perspectives and applications.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Routes of Well-Being, Spiritual Harmony and Recovery in Mental Health: The Community as a Policy-Maker.International journal of health policy and management · 2025Article
- Mutual Aid Groups for Loneliness, Psychosocial Disability, and Continuity of Care.Community mental health journal · 2024Article
- "Here, I am More than Just Symptoms Combined": Mental Health Services from the Perspective of Community Rehabilitation Groups.Journal of patient experience · 2024Article
- Unemployment and mental health: a global study of unemployment's influence on diverse mental disorders.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Governance in mental healthcare policies during the COVID-19 pandemic in Mexico.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- Health care providers' perceptions of barriers to perinatal mental healthcare in South Africa.BMC public health · 2021Article
- [Analysis of Governance in the Implementation of the Chilean Community Mental Health ModelAnálise da governança na implementação do modelo comunitário de saúde mental no Chile].Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo analyze the conceptualization of the term governance on public mental health programs.
methodsIn this systematic review, we analyzed the scientific literature published in the international scenario during 15 years (from 2000 to 2015). The databases analyzed were: Medline, CINAHL, PsycINFO and PubMed. Governance and mental health were the descriptors. We included relevant articles according to our subject of study and levels of analysis: (i) the concept of governance in mental health; (ii) process and decision spaces; (iii) strategic and pertinent actors who operate in the functioning of the health system, and (iv) social regulations. We excluded letters to the editor, news articles, comments and case reports, incomplete articles and articles whose approach did not include the object of study of this review.
resultsWe have found five conceptualizations of the term governance on mental health in the area of provision policies and service organization. The agents were both those who offer and those who receive the services: we identified several social norms.
conclusionsThe concept of governance in mental health includes standards of quality and attention centered on the patient, and incorporates the consumers of mental healthcare in the decision-making process. OBJETIVO: Analizar la conceptualización del término gobernanza en las políticas de salud mental. MÉTODOS: En esta revisión sistemática se analizó literatura científica publicada en el ámbito internacional durante 15 años (de 2000 hasta 2015). Las bases de datos analizadas fueron: Medline, CINAHL, PsycINFO y PubMed. Los descriptores fueron gobernanza y salud mental. Fueron incluidos artículos relevantes de acuerdo a nuestro objeto de estudio y niveles de análisis: (i) concepto de gobernanza en salud mental; (ii) proceso y espacios de decisión; (iii) actores estratégicos y de interés que intervienen en el funcionamiento del sistema de salud, y (iv) normas sociales. Se excluyeron cartas al editor, noticias, comentarios y reporte de caso, artículos incompletos y artículos que no incluyeran en su abordaje el objeto de estudio de esta revisión. RESULTADOS: Se reportaron cinco conceptualizaciones del término gobernanza en salud mental en el ámbito de políticas de provisión y organización de servicios. Los actores fueron desde proveedores a usuarios de servicios; se identificaron diversas normas sociales. CONCLUSIONES: El concepto de gobernanza en salud mental incorpora estándares de calidad y atención centrada en el paciente, e incluye a los usuarios en la toma de decisiones.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.