Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28146061›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2017

The Glia Response after Peripheral Nerve Injury: A Comparison between Schwann Cells and Olfactory Ensheathing Cells and Their Uses for Neural Regenerative Therapies.

Matthew J Barton, James St John, Mary Clarke, Alison Wright, Jenny Ekberg

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Matthew J BartonMenzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Nathan QLD 4111, Australia. m.barton@griffith.edu.au.
James St JohnMenzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Nathan QLD 4111, Australia. j.stjohn@griffith.edu.au.
Mary ClarkeGriffith Institute for Drug Discovery, Griffith University, Nathan, QLD 4111, Australia. m.clarke1@griffith.edu.au.
Alison WrightFaculty of Health and Medical Science, Bond University, Robina, QLD 4226, Australia. alison.wright@griffith.edu.au.
Jenny EkbergClem Jones Centre for Neurobiology & Stem Cell Research, Griffith University, Nathan QLD 4111, Australia. jekberg@bond.edu.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The peripheral nervous system (PNS) exhibits a much larger capacity for regeneration than the central nervous system (CNS). One reason for this difference is the difference in glial cell types between the two systems. PNS glia respond rapidly to nerve injury by clearing debris from the injury site, supplying essential growth factors and providing structural support; all of which enhances neuronal regeneration. Thus, transplantation of glial cells from the PNS is a very promising therapy for injuries to both the PNS and the CNS. There are two key types of PNS glia: olfactory ensheathing cells (OECs), which populate the olfactory nerve, and Schwann cells (SCs), which are present in the rest of the PNS. These two glial types share many similar morphological and functional characteristics but also exhibit key differences. The olfactory nerve is constantly turning over throughout life, which means OECs are continuously stimulating neural regeneration, whilst SCs only promote regeneration after direct injury to the PNS. This review presents a comparison between these two PNS systems in respect to normal physiology, developmental anatomy, glial functions and their responses to injury. A thorough understanding of the mechanisms and differences between the two systems is crucial for the development of future therapies using transplantation of peripheral glia to treat neural injuries and/or disease.

Indexed as

Nerve RegenerationAnimalsCell TransplantationHomeostasisHumansImmunomodulationInflammationNeurogliaOlfactory BulbOlfactory NervePeripheral Nerve InjuriesSchwann CellsSensory Receptor CellsSignal TransductionGlianerve-injurynerve-regenerationolfactory-ensheathing-cellSchwann-cell

Identifiers

PMID28146061
PMCPMC5343823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.