Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28146043›Full record

ArticleMelanoma research2017

Characterization of melanoma susceptibility genes in high-risk patients from Central Italy.

Cristina Pellegrini, Maria Giovanna Maturo, Claudia Martorelli, Mariano Suppa, Ambra Antonini, Dimitra Kostaki, Lucilla Verna, Maria Teresa Landi, Ketty Peris, Maria Concetta Fargnoli

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Melanoma research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Journal of medical genetics · 2020
    Article
  11. Review
  12. BioMed research international · 2020
    Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Telomeres and Telomerase in Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Review
  17. Familial Melanoma: Diagnostic and Management Implications.Dermatology practical & conceptual · 2019
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Cristina PellegriniDepartments of aDermatology bOncology, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy cDepartment of Dermatology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy dDepartment of Dermatology, Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium eDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Maria Giovanna Maturo
Claudia Martorelli
Mariano Suppa
Ambra Antonini
Dimitra Kostaki
Lucilla Verna
Maria Teresa Landi
Ketty Peris
Maria Concetta Fargnoli
Division of Cancer Epidemiology and GeneticsGTx (United States) · USUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · ITUniversité Libre de Bruxelles · BEUniversity of L'Aquila · IT

Funding

STUDIES OF PERSONS AT HIGH RISK OF CANCER--GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGYZ01CP004410 · NCI · DIVISION OF CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY AND GENETICS · PI TUCKER, MARGARET · 1985 to 2008
$15.0M
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 CP004410
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic susceptibility to cutaneous melanoma has been investigated in Italian high-risk melanoma patients from different geographical regions. CDKN2A, CDK4, and MC1R genes have been screened in most studies, MITF and POT1 were screened in only one study, and none analyzed the TERT promoter. We carried out a mutational analysis of CDKN2A, CDK4 exon 2, POT1 p.S270N, MITF exon 10, MC1R, and the TERT promoter in 106 high-risk patients with familial melanoma (FM) and sporadic multiple primary melanoma (spMPM) from Central Italy and evaluated mutations according to the clinicopathological characteristics of patients and lesions. In FM, CDKN2A mutations were detected in 8.3% of the families, including one undescribed exon 1β mutation (p.T31M), and their prevalence increased with the number of affected relatives within the family. MC1R variants were identified in 65% of the patients and the TERT rs2853669 promoter polymorphism was identified in 58% of the patients. A novel synonymous mutation detected in MITF exon 10 (c.861A>G, p.E287E), although predicted as a splice site mutation by computational tools, could not functionally be confirmed to alter splicing. For spMPM, 3% carried CDKN2A mutations, 79% carried MC1R variants, and 47% carried the TERT rs2853669 promoter polymorphism. MC1R variants were associated with fair skin type and light hair color both in FM and in spMPM, and with a reduction of age at diagnosis in FM patients. Mutations in CDK4 exon 2 and the POT1 p.S270N mutation were not detected. A low frequency of CDKN2A mutations and a high prevalence of MC1R variants characterize high-risk melanoma patients from Central Italy.

Indexed as

Genetic Predisposition to DiseaseMutationAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansItalyMaleMelanomaMiddle AgedPrognosisSkin NeoplasmsBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID28146043
PMCPMC7050442
OpenAlexW2589017165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.