Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28146014›Full record

ArticleCancer nursing

Comorbid Dementia and Cancer in Residents of Nursing Homes: Secondary Analyses of a Cross-Sectional Study.

Kjersti Marie Blytt, Geir Selbæk, Jorunn Drageset, Gerd Karin Natvig, Bettina S Husebo

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer nursing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Equal receipt of specialized palliative care in breast and prostate cancer: a register study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Kjersti Marie BlyttAuthor Affiliations: Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care (Ms Blytt and Drs Drageset, Natvig, and Husebo) and Centre for Elderly and Nursing Home Medicine (Ms Blytt and Dr Husebo), University of Bergen; Norwegian Competence Center for Sleep Disorders, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen (Ms Blytt); Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo; Ageing and Health, Norwegian Centre for Research, Education and Service Development, Vestfold Hospital Trust, Tonsberg; and Centre for Old Age Psychiatry Research, Innlandet Hospital Trust, Ottestad (Dr Selbæk); Faculty for Health and Social Sciences, Bergen University College (Dr Drageset); and the Municipality of Bergen (Dr Husebo), Norway.
Geir Selbæk
Jorunn Drageset
Gerd Karin Natvig
Bettina S Husebo
Norwegian Directorate of Health · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLife expectancy is increasing continuously, which increases the likelihood of developing dementia or cancer. Both dementia and cancer are serious conditions that give manifold symptoms. The interaction of these conditions is however complex and less explored.

objectivesThe aim of this study was to identify the prevalence of cancer and differences regarding neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) and medication among nursing home (NH) patients with and without dementia and cancer.

methodsThis is a cross-sectional study of Norwegian NH patients (N = 1825). Participants were categorized according to degree of dementia (Clinical Dementia Rating > 1) and cancer diagnoses. Differences in NPS and other symptoms, as well as the use of medication, were explored.

resultsEighty-four percent of NH patients had dementia, and 5.5% had comorbid dementia and cancer. Patients with comorbid dementia and cancer received significantly more analgesics compared with patients without cancer but with dementia (P < .05). Compared with patients without dementia but with cancer, patients with comorbid dementia and cancer had significantly more NPS, including sleep disturbances and agitation.

conclusionsPatients with comorbid dementia and cancer receive more analgesics than patients with dementia but still display more agitation and sleep disturbances than patients with cancer and patients with neither dementia nor cancer, suggesting that symptoms may not be treated adequately. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The results indicate a considerable strain for patients with comorbid dementia and cancer and highlight essential challenges for the clinician who is responsible for treatment and care. Nurses should pay attention to agitation and sleep disturbances among patients with comorbid dementia and cancer.

Indexed as

ComorbidityAgedAged, 80 and overAnalgesicsCross-Sectional StudiesDementiaFemaleHumansMaleNeoplasmsNorwayNursing HomesOncology NursingPractice Guidelines as TopicPrevalencePsychomotor AgitationAnalgesics

Identifiers

PMID28146014
PMCPMC5839697
OpenAlexW2586702317

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.