Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28145941›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of emergency medicine : official journal of the European Society for Emergency Medicine2018

Lessons learned in applying the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research methodology to translating Canadian Emergency Department Information System Presenting Complaints List into German.

Dominik Brammen, Felix Greiner, Harald Dormann, Carsten Mach, Christian Wrede, Anne Ballaschk, Declan Stewart, Steven Walker, Christine Oesterling, Martin Kulla

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of emergency medicine : official journal of the European Society for Emergency Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Impact of government pyrotechnics ban on emergency department usage rates around the turn of the years.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Acute Onset of Impaired Consciousness.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2024
    Review
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Medical Emergencies During the COVID-19 Pandemic.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2020
    Article
  19. [Routine Data from Emergency Departments: Varying Documentation Standards, Billing Modalities and Data Custodians at an Identical Unit of Care].Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)) · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Dominik BrammenDepartment of Trauma Surgery, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg.
Felix GreinerDepartment of Trauma Surgery, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg.
Harald DormannDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Klinikum Fuerth, Fuerth.
Carsten MachEmergency Department, Uniklinik RWTH Aachen, Aachen.
Christian WredeEmergency Department, HELIOS Hospital Berlin-Buch, Berlin.
Anne BallaschkDepartment of Trauma Surgery, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg.
Declan StewartEmergency Department, Klinikum Südstadt, Rostock.
Steven WalkerSt Gilesmedical.
Christine OesterlingEastmead Surgery, London, UK.
Martin KullaDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Bundeswehr Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe patient's presenting complaint guides diagnosis and treatment in the emergency department, but there is no classification system available in German. The Canadian Emergency Department Information System (CEDIS) Presenting Complaint List (PCL) is available only in English and French. As translation risks the altering of meaning, the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) has set guidelines to ensure translational accuracy. The aim of this paper is to describe our experiences of using the ISPOR guidelines to translate the CEDIS PCL into German. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe CEDIS PCL (version 3.0) was forward-translated and back-translated in accordance with the ISPOR guidelines using bilingual clinicians/translators and an occupationally mixed evaluation group that completed a self-developed questionnaire.

resultsThe CEDIS PCL was forward-translated (four emergency physicians) and back-translated (three mixed translators). Back-translation uncovered eight PCL items requiring amendment. In total, 156 comments were received from 32 evaluators, six of which resulted in amendments.

conclusionThe ISPOR guidelines facilitated adaptation of a PCL into German, but the process required time, language skills and clinical knowledge. The current methodology may be applicable to translating the CEDIS PCL into other languages, with the aim of developing a harmonized, multilingual PCL.

Indexed as

Economics, PharmaceuticalHospital Information SystemsTranslatingCanadaEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleGermanyHumansInternationalityMaleOutcome Assessment, Health CarePractice Guidelines as TopicResearch DesignSocieties, Medical

Identifiers

PMID28145941
PMCPMC6039420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.