Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28145902›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of clinical investigation2017

Redirecting cardiac growth mechanisms for therapeutic regeneration.

Ravi Karra, Kenneth D Poss

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of clinical investigation, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Cell Therapy in the Treatment of Coronary Heart Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Cardiac fibrosis in oncologic therapies.Current opinion in physiology · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Zebrafish Heart Failure Models.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ravi Karra
Kenneth D Poss

Funding

Regulation of Myocardial Regeneration in ZebrafishR01HL081674 · NHLBI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI POSS, KENNETH D · 2005 to 2019
$6.6M
Identification and application of regulatory elements for heart regenerationR01HL136182 · NHLBI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI BLACK, BRIAN L, POSS, KENNETH D · 2017 to 2020
$3.1M
Regulation of the Epicardial Injury Response During Heart Regeneration in ZebrafishR01HL131319 · NHLBI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI POSS, KENNETH D · 2016 to 2019
$1.6M
Biomarkers of Heart RegenerationK08HL116485 · NHLBI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI KARRA, RAVI · 2013 to 2017
$665k
NHLBI NIH HHS K08 HL116485NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL081674NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL131319NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL136182
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Heart failure is a major source of morbidity and mortality. Replacing lost myocardium with new tissue is a major goal of regenerative medicine. Unlike adult mammals, zebrafish and neonatal mice are capable of heart regeneration following cardiac injury. In both contexts, the regenerative program echoes molecular and cellular events that occur during cardiac development and morphogenesis, notably muscle creation through division of cardiomyocytes. Based on studies over the past decade, it is now accepted that the adult mammalian heart undergoes a low grade of cardiomyocyte turnover. Recent data suggest that this cardiomyocyte turnover can be augmented in the adult mammalian heart by redeployment of developmental factors. These findings and others suggest that stimulating endogenous regenerative responses can emerge as a therapeutic strategy for human cardiovascular disease.

Indexed as

Heart FailureMyocardiumMyocytes, CardiacRegenerative MedicineAnimalsHumansMiceZebrafish

Identifiers

PMID28145902
PMCPMC5272171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.