Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28145883›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2017

Therapy-induced developmental reprogramming of prostate cancer cells and acquired therapy resistance.

Mannan Nouri, Josselin Caradec, Amy Anne Lubik, Na Li, Brett G Hollier, Mandeep Takhar, Manuel Altimirano-Dimas, Mengqian Chen, Mani Roshan-Moniri, Miriam Butler and 17 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Advances in neuroendocrine prostate cancer research: From model construction to molecular network analyses.Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Mannan NouriVancouver Prostate Centre, Vancouver, Canada.
Josselin CaradecVancouver Prostate Centre, Vancouver, Canada.
Amy Anne LubikVancouver Prostate Centre, Vancouver, Canada.
Na LiVancouver Prostate Centre, Vancouver, Canada.
Brett G HollierInstitute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.
Mandeep TakharGenomeDX Biosciences, Vancouver, Canada.
Manuel Altimirano-DimasVancouver Prostate Centre, Vancouver, Canada.
Mengqian ChenDrug Discovery & Biomedical Sciences, South Carolina College of Pharmacy, Columbia, South Carolina, USA.
Mani Roshan-MoniriVancouver Prostate Centre, Vancouver, Canada.
Miriam ButlerVancouver Prostate Centre, Vancouver, Canada.
Melanie LehmanInstitute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.
Jennifer BishopVancouver Prostate Centre, Vancouver, Canada.
Sarah TruongVancouver Prostate Centre, Vancouver, Canada.
Shih-Chieh HuangVancouver Prostate Centre, Vancouver, Canada.
Dawn CochraneDepartment of Molecular Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, Canada.
Michael CoxVancouver Prostate Centre, Vancouver, Canada.
Colin CollinsVancouver Prostate Centre, Vancouver, Canada.
Martin GleaveVancouver Prostate Centre, Vancouver, Canada.
Nicholas ErhoGenomeDX Biosciences, Vancouver, Canada.
Mohamed AlshalafaGenomeDX Biosciences, Vancouver, Canada.
Elai DavicioniGenomeDX Biosciences, Vancouver, Canada.
Colleen NelsonVancouver Prostate Centre, Vancouver, Canada.
Sheryl Gregory-EvansDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
R Jeffrey KarnesDepartment of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Robert B JenkinsDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Eric A KleinGlickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Ralph ButtyanVancouver Prostate Centre, Vancouver, Canada.
University of British Columbia · CAGenome British Columbia · CAQueensland University of Technology · AUMayo Clinic · USBC Cancer Agency · CACleveland Clinic · USColumbia College - South Carolina · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Treatment-induced neuroendocrine transdifferentiation (NEtD) complicates therapies for metastatic prostate cancer (PCa). Based on evidence that PCa cells can transdifferentiate to other neuroectodermally-derived cell lineages in vitro, we proposed that NEtD requires first an intermediary reprogramming to metastable cancer stem-like cells (CSCs) of a neural class and we demonstrate that several different AR+/PSA+ PCa cell lines were efficiently reprogrammed to, maintained and propagated as CSCs by growth in androgen-free neural/neural crest (N/NC) stem medium. Such reprogrammed cells lost features of prostate differentiation; gained features of N/NC stem cells and tumor-initiating potential; were resistant to androgen signaling inhibition; and acquired an invasive phenotype in vitro and in vivo. When placed back into serum-containing mediums, reprogrammed cells could be re-differentiated to N-/NC-derived cell lineages or return back to an AR+ prostate-like state. Once returned, the AR+ cells were resistant to androgen signaling inhibition. Acute androgen deprivation or anti-androgen treatment in serum-containing medium led to the transient appearance of a sub-population of cells with similar characteristics. Finally, a 132 gene signature derived from reprogrammed PCa cell lines distinguished tumors from PCa patients with adverse outcomes. This model may explain neural manifestations of PCa associated with lethal disease. The metastable nature of the reprogrammed stem-like PCa cells suggests that cycles of PCa cell reprogramming followed by re-differentiation may support disease progression and therapeutic resistance. The ability of a gene signature from reprogrammed PCa cells to identify tumors from patients with metastasis or PCa-specific mortality implies that developmental reprogramming is linked to aggressive tumor behaviors.

Indexed as

AnimalsBlotting, WesternCell TransdifferentiationCellular ReprogrammingDisease ProgressionDrug Resistance, NeoplasmFlow CytometryFluorescent Antibody TechniqueHeterograftsHumansMaleMiceNeoplastic Stem CellsOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisProstatic NeoplasmsReal-Time Polymerase Chain Reactioncancer stem cellhormone resistanceneural crestneuroendocrine transdifferentiationprostate cancer

Identifiers

PMID28145883
PMCPMC5386661
OpenAlexW2581252948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.