Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28144911›Full record

ArticleThe AAPS journal2017

Pharmacokinetic Steady-States Highlight Interesting Target-Mediated Disposition Properties.

Johan Gabrielsson, Lambertus A Peletier

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The AAPS journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Does In Vitro Potency Predict Clinically Efficacious Concentrations?Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Challenge model of TNFJournal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Impact of mathematical pharmacology on practice and theory: four case studies.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Johan GabrielssonDepartment of Biomedical Sciences and Veterinary Public Health, Division of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Box 7028, SE-750 07, Uppsala, Sweden.
Lambertus A PeletierMathematical Institute, Leiden University, PB 9512, 2300 RA, Leiden, The Netherlands. peletier@math.leidenuniv.nl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this paper, we derive explicit expressions for the concentrations of ligand L, target R and ligand-target complex RL at steady state for the classical model describing target-mediated drug disposition, in the presence of a constant-rate infusion of ligand. We demonstrate that graphing the steady-state values of ligand, target and ligand-target complex, we obtain striking and often singular patterns, which yield a great deal of insight and understanding about the underlying processes. Deriving explicit expressions for the dependence of L, R and RL on the infusion rate, and displaying graphs of the relations between L, R and RL, we give qualitative and quantitive information for the experimentalist about the processes involved. Understanding target turnover is pivotal for optimising these processes when target-mediated drug disposition (TMDD) prevails. By a combination of mathematical analysis and simulations, we also show that the evolution of the three concentration profiles towards their respective steady-states can be quite complex, especially for lower infusion rates. We also show how parameter estimates obtained from iv bolus studies can be used to derive steady-state concentrations of ligand, target and complex. The latter may serve as a template for future experimental designs.

Indexed as

Models, TheoreticalPharmacokineticsInfusions, Parenteralconstant-rate infusion protocoldrug dispositiondrug-target interaction

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.