Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28144849›Full record

ArticleJournal of materials science. Materials in medicine2017

Biocompatible bacterial cellulose membrane in dural defect repair of rat.

Frederico de Melo Tavares de Lima, Flávia Cristina Morone Pinto, Belmira Lara da Silveira Andrade-da-Costa, Jaiurte Gomes Martins da Silva, Olávio Campos Júnior, José Lamartine de Andrade Aguiar

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Clinical management of dural defects: A review.World journal of clinical cases · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Frederico de Melo Tavares de LimaCenter for Experimental Surgery, Department of Surgery, Center for Health Sciences, Federal University of Pernambuco, UFPE, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
Flávia Cristina Morone PintoCenter for Experimental Surgery, Department of Surgery, Center for Health Sciences, Federal University of Pernambuco, UFPE, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil. fcmorone@gmail.com.
Belmira Lara da Silveira Andrade-da-CostaDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, Center for Health Sciences, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
Jaiurte Gomes Martins da SilvaImmunopathology Laboratory Keizo Asami, LIKA, Federal University of Pernambuco, UFPE, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
Olávio Campos JúniorImmunopathology Laboratory Keizo Asami, LIKA, Federal University of Pernambuco, UFPE, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
José Lamartine de Andrade AguiarCenter for Experimental Surgery, Department of Surgery, Center for Health Sciences, Federal University of Pernambuco, UFPE, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Duraplasty is necessary in nearly 30% of all neurological surgeries. Different tissues and materials have been evaluated in dura mater repair or as dural substitutes in neurosurgery. The aim was to evaluate the biocompatibility of the bacterial cellulose (BC) membranes, produced from sugarcane molasses, for dural defect repair in rats. Forty adults males Wistar rats divided into two groups: a control (ePTFE) and an experimental (BC). Bilateral frontoparietal craniectomy was performed, and a dural defect was created. The arachnoid underlying defect was disrupted with a narrow hook. The animals were observed for 120 days. There were no cases of infection, cerebrospinal fluid fistulae, delayed hemorrhages, behavior disturbances, seizures and palsies. The BC membrane showed to have suitable biocompatibility properties, was not induced immune reaction, nor chronic inflammatory response and absence of neurotoxicity signals.

Indexed as

AnimalsBacteriaBiocompatible MaterialsCelluloseDura MaterImmune SystemInflammationMaleMolassesRatsRats, WistarSaccharumWound HealingBiocompatible MaterialsCellulose

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.