Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28144841›Full record

ArticleJournal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics2017

Adjusted adaptive Lasso for covariate model-building in nonlinear mixed-effect pharmacokinetic models.

Elham Haem, Kajsa Harling, Seyyed Mohammad Taghi Ayatollahi, Najaf Zare, Mats O Karlsson

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Covariate modeling in pharmacometrics: General points for consideration.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2024
    Review
  5. Go beyond the limits of genetic algorithm in daily covariate selection practice.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Elham HaemDepartment of Biostatistics, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences School of Medicine, Shiraz, Iran.
Kajsa HarlingDepartment of Pharmaceutical Biosciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Seyyed Mohammad Taghi AyatollahiDepartment of Biostatistics, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences School of Medicine, Shiraz, Iran.
Najaf ZareDepartment of Biostatistics, Infertility Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran. najafzare@sums.ac.ir.
Mats O KarlssonDepartment of Pharmaceutical Biosciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Uppsala University · SEShiraz University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One important aim in population pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics is identification and quantification of the relationships between the parameters and covariates. Lasso has been suggested as a technique for simultaneous estimation and covariate selection. In linear regression, it has been shown that Lasso possesses no oracle properties, which means it asymptotically performs as though the true underlying model was given in advance. Adaptive Lasso (ALasso) with appropriate initial weights is claimed to possess oracle properties; however, it can lead to poor predictive performance when there is multicollinearity between covariates. This simulation study implemented a new version of ALasso, called adjusted ALasso (AALasso), to take into account the ratio of the standard error of the maximum likelihood (ML) estimator to the ML coefficient as the initial weight in ALasso to deal with multicollinearity in non-linear mixed-effect models. The performance of AALasso was compared with that of ALasso and Lasso. PK data was simulated in four set-ups from a one-compartment bolus input model. Covariates were created by sampling from a multivariate standard normal distribution with no, low (0.2), moderate (0.5) or high (0.7) correlation. The true covariates influenced only clearance at different magnitudes. AALasso, ALasso and Lasso were compared in terms of mean absolute prediction error and error of the estimated covariate coefficient. The results show that AALasso performed better in small data sets, even in those in which a high correlation existed between covariates. This makes AALasso a promising method for covariate selection in nonlinear mixed-effect models.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationModels, BiologicalModels, StatisticalPharmacokineticsHumansMultivariate AnalysisNonlinear DynamicsRegression AnalysisAdaptive LassoCovariate model buildingLassoMixed effects modelingMulticollinearity

Identifiers

PMID28144841
OpenAlexW2585254554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.