Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28144840›Full record

ArticleClinical pharmacokinetics2017

Population Pharmacokinetic Model and Pharmacokinetic Target Attainment of Micafungin in Intensive Care Unit Patients.

Lisa C Martial, Rob Ter Heine, Jeroen A Schouten, Nicole G Hunfeld, Henk J van Leeuwen, Paul E Verweij, Dylan W de Lange, Peter Pickkers, Roger J Brüggemann

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Role of liposomal amphotericin B in intensive care unit: an expert opinion paper.Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Challenges in Antifungal Therapy in Diabetes Mellitus.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020
    Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Lisa C MartialDepartment of Pharmacy, Radboud University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9101, Nijmegen, 6525 HB, The Netherlands.
Rob Ter HeineDepartment of Pharmacy, Radboud University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9101, Nijmegen, 6525 HB, The Netherlands.
Jeroen A SchoutenDepartment of Intensive Care, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Nicole G HunfeldDepartment of Intensive Care and Pharmacy, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Henk J van LeeuwenDepartment of Intensive Care, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
Paul E VerweijThe Netherlands Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Dylan W de LangeDepartment of Intensive Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Peter PickkersDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Roger J BrüggemannDepartment of Pharmacy, Radboud University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9101, Nijmegen, 6525 HB, The Netherlands. roger.bruggemann@radboudumc.nl.
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLRadboud University Medical Center · NLCanisius-Wilhelmina Ziekenhuis · NLErasmus MC · NLRijnstate Hospital · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo study the pharmacokinetics of micafungin in intensive care patients and assess pharmacokinetic (PK) target attainment for various dosing strategies.

methodsMicafungin PK data from 20 intensive care unit patients were available. A population-PK model was developed. Various dosing regimens were simulated: licensed regimens (I) 100 mg daily; (II) 100 mg daily with 200 mg from day 5; and adapted regimens 200 mg on day 1 followed by (III) 100 mg daily; (IV) 150 mg daily; and (V) 200 mg daily. Target attainment based on a clinical PK target for Candida as well as non-Candida parapsilosis infections was assessed for relevant minimum inhibitory concentrations [MICs] (Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute). Parameter uncertainty was taken into account in simulations.

resultsA two-compartment model best fitted the data. Clearance was 1.10 (root square error 8%) L/h and V

conclusionsThe licensed micafungin maintenance dose results in adequate exposure based on our simulations with a clinical PK target for Candida infections but only 62% of patients reach the target for non-C. parapsilosis. In the case of pathogens with an attenuated micafungin MIC, patients may benefit from dose escalation to 200 mg daily. This encourages future study.

Indexed as

Intensive Care UnitsModels, BiologicalAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntifungal AgentsCandidaCandida parapsilosisCandidiasisCohort StudiesDrug Delivery SystemsEchinocandinsFemaleHumansLipopeptidesMaleAntifungal AgentsEchinocandinsLipopeptidesMicafunginIntensive Care Unit PatientInvasive CandidiasisMicafunginSequential Organ Failure AssessmentSequential Organ Failure Assessment Score

Identifiers

PMID28144840
PMCPMC5591795
OpenAlexW2584393786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.