Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28144827›Full record

ReviewCurrent rheumatology reports2017

Biomarkers for Musculoskeletal Pain Conditions: Use of Brain Imaging and Machine Learning.

Jeff Boissoneault, Landrew Sevel, Janelle Letzen, Michael Robinson, Roland Staud

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current rheumatology reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05860205 (A Feasibility and Pilot Study of a Multiple Component Mobile-aid Pain Reduction Intervention to Decrease Myofascial Pain Syndrome), which is not on this map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05860205 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

A Feasibility and Pilot Study of a Multiple Component Mobile-aid Pain Reduction Intervention to Decrease Myofascial Pain Syndrome

TypeinterventionalSponsorKailea ManningRan2023 to 2023Enrolled30ConditionsMyofascial Pain SyndromeArmsMultiple Component Mobile-Aid Pain Reduction Intervention, Osteopathic Manipulation Treatment, Sham Osteopathic Manipulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Neuroimaging Assessment of Pain.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Brain Imaging Biomarkers for Chronic Pain.Frontiers in neurology · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Grand Challenges in Neuromodulatory Interventions.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jeff BoissoneaultDepartment of Clinical and Health Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Landrew SevelDepartment of Clinical and Health Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Janelle LetzenDepartment of Clinical and Health Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Michael RobinsonDepartment of Clinical and Health Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Roland StaudDepartment of Medicine, University of Florida, PO Box 100277, Gainesville, FL, 32610, USA. staudr@ufl.edu.

Funding

Peripheral and Central Mechanisms of Fatigue and Pain in Patients with ME/CFSR01NR014049 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI STAUD, ROLAND · 2012 to 2016
$1.8M
NINR NIH HHS R01 NR014049
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic musculoskeletal pain condition often shows poor correlations between tissue abnormalities and clinical pain. Therefore, classification of pain conditions like chronic low back pain, osteoarthritis, and fibromyalgia depends mostly on self report and less on objective findings like X-ray or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) changes. However, recent advances in structural and functional brain imaging have identified brain abnormalities in chronic pain conditions that can be used for illness classification. Because the analysis of complex and multivariate brain imaging data is challenging, machine learning techniques have been increasingly utilized for this purpose. The goal of machine learning is to train specific classifiers to best identify variables of interest on brain MRIs (i.e., biomarkers). This report describes classification techniques capable of separating MRI-based brain biomarkers of chronic pain patients from healthy controls with high accuracy (70-92%) using machine learning, as well as critical scientific, practical, and ethical considerations related to their potential clinical application. Although self-report remains the gold standard for pain assessment, machine learning may aid in the classification of chronic pain disorders like chronic back pain and fibromyalgia as well as provide mechanistic information regarding their neural correlates.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsBiomarkersBrainChronic PainHumansMachine LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingMusculoskeletal PainBiomarkersChronic painClassificationMachine learningMagnetic resonance imaging (MRI)Musculoskeletal

Identifiers

PMID28144827
PMCPMC6875750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.