ArticleJournal of experimental orthopaedics2017
A preclinical numerical assessment of a polyetheretherketone femoral component in total knee arthroplasty during gait.
Article in Journal of experimental orthopaedics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluation of Patellar Groove Prostheses in Veterinary Medicine: Review of Technological Advances, Technical Aspects, and Quality Standards.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- A Comprehensive Review on Manufacturing and Characterization of Polyetheretherketone Polymers for Dental Implant Applications.3D printing and additive manufacturing · 2024Review
- Article
- The Effect of Patient-Related Factors on the Primary Fixation of PEEK and Titanium Tibial Components: A Population-Based FE Study.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Validation of the Finite Element Model versus Biomechanical Assessments of Dental Implants and Total Knee Replacements.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- The Effects of Different Femoral Component Materials on Bone and Implant Response in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Finite Element Analysis.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Long-term clinical results of alumina ceramic medial pivot total knee arthroplasty: a 10-year follow-up study.Arthroplasty (London, England) · 2023Article
- Migration of the femoral component and clinical outcomes after total knee replacement: a narrative review.Musculoskeletal surgery · 2021Review
- The Effects of Cyclic Loading and Motion on the Implant-Cement Interface and Cement Mantle of PEEK and Cobalt-Chromium Femoral Total Knee Arthroplasty Implants: A Preliminary Study.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Third Body Wear of UHMWPE-on-PEEK-OPTIMA™.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Wear and Friction of UHMWPE-on-PEEK OPTIMA™.Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials · 2019Article
- The mechanical response of a polyetheretherketone femoral knee implant under a deep squatting loading condition.Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine · 2017Article
- Peek polymer in orthodontics: A pilot study on children.Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundConventional total knee replacement designs show high success rates but in the long term, the stiff metal components may affect bone quality of the distal femur. In this study we introduce an all-polymer total knee replacement device containing a PEEK femoral component on an UHMWPE tibial implant and study its mechanical integrity, fixation, and stress shielding of the periprosthetic femur.
methodsThe implant was analysed in finite element simulations of level gait, adopted from the ISO 14243-1 standard. Mechanical integrity of the implant and underlying cement mantle were tested, and the fixation strength of the cement-implant interface was studied. Stress shielding was assessed based on strain energy density distributions in the distal femur. We compared PEEK and CoCr implants for mechanical performance and fixation, and compared both versions against an intact case to determine the change in bone strain energy density.
resultsThe mechanical integrity of the PEEK and CoCr components was similar in magnitude, but differences in stress patterns were found. Moreover, the cement mantle was loaded more heavily in the CoCr configuration. Under similar interface properties, the CoCr-cement interface was more at risk of failure than the PEEK-cement interface. The bone strain energy density distribution of the PEEK implant was similar to the intact case, while the CoCr implant showed signs of stress shielding, and a different distribution than the intact and PEEK models.
conclusionsDuring gait, the PEEK femoral component performed similarly to CoCr, with no added risk for the cement mantle. The reduction in stress shielding for PEEK was evident and confirms the potential reduction in long-term loss of bone stock for this all-polymer knee implant.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.